Literature DB >> 11526980

Alcohol place preference conditioning in high- and low-alcohol preferring selected lines of mice.

N J Grahame1, J A Chester, K Rodd-Henricks, T K Li, L Lumeng.   

Abstract

High- and low-alcohol preferring (HAP and LAP) selected lines of mice diverge greatly in free-choice alcohol consumption. This study investigated whether the lines differ in a measure of alcohol reward not dependent on drinking, specifically place conditioning. Mice were subjected to a differential conditioning procedure in which four alcohol-paired CS+ trials on one floor cue (0, 1.5, 3, or 4 g/kg; ns=20-24) alternated with four saline-paired CS- trials on a different floor cue. Testing was on a split floor, half CS+ and half CS-. HAP and LAP mice showed no preference at 0 g/kg, and equivalent, moderate preference at 1.5 and 3 g/kg alcohol. At 4 g/kg, LAP, but not HAP mice showed an increase in preference. The present findings imply greater efficacy of alcohol preference conditioning in LAP mice, but do not speak for line differences in sensitivity. Results do not support the hypothesis that selection for high drinking yields greater efficacy of alcohol as a reinforcer when reward is measured using a technique that does not rely on drinking. Low drinking in LAP mice may emerge from innate taste avoidance of alcohol as a result of selective breeding for low preference, which prevents them from encountering alcohol's rewarding, pharmacological effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11526980     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00476-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetic studies of alcohol self-administration and withdrawal.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of Chronic Stress on Alcohol Reward- and Anxiety-Related Behavior in High- and Low-Alcohol Preferring Mice.

Authors:  Kristen R Breit; Julia A Chester
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Relative fluid novelty differentially alters the time course of limited-access ethanol and water intake in selectively bred high-alcohol-preferring mice.

Authors:  David N Linsenbardt; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Genetic relationship between ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and other ethanol phenotypes in 15 inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Affect-related behaviors in mice selectively bred for high and low voluntary alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Adem Can; Nicholas J Grahame; Todd D Gould
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 6.  Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol.

Authors:  John C Crabbe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2014

7.  Development of ethanol withdrawal-related sensitization and relapse drinking in mice selected for high- or low-ethanol preference.

Authors:  Marcelo F Lopez; Nicholas J Grahame; Howard C Becker
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 8.  Ethanol drinking in rodents: is free-choice drinking related to the reinforcing effects of ethanol?

Authors:  Alexis S Green; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.405

9.  Emotional reactivity to incentive downshift as a correlated response to selection of high and low alcohol preferring mice and an influencing factor on ethanol intake.

Authors:  Liana M Matson; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.405

10.  Rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol in High Drinking in the Dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Christopher L Cunningham; Phoebe J Smitasin; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.