Literature DB >> 26404495

Emotional reactivity to incentive downshift as a correlated response to selection of high and low alcohol preferring mice and an influencing factor on ethanol intake.

Liana M Matson1, Nicholas J Grahame2.   

Abstract

Losing a job or significant other are examples of incentive loss that result in negative emotional reactions. The occurrence of negative life events is associated with increased drinking (Keyes, Hatzenbuehler, & Hasin, 2011). Further, certain genotypes are more likely to drink alcohol in response to stressful negative life events (Blomeyer et al., 2008; Covault et al., 2007). Shared genetic factors may contribute to alcohol drinking and emotional reactivity, but this relationship is not currently well understood. We used an incentive downshift paradigm to address whether emotional reactivity is elevated in mice predisposed to drink alcohol. We also investigated if ethanol drinking is influenced in High Alcohol Preferring mice that had been exposed to an incentive downshift. Incentive downshift procedures have been widely utilized to model emotional reactivity, and involve shifting a high reward group to a low reward and comparing the shifted group to a consistently rewarded control group. Here, we show that replicate lines of selectively bred High Alcohol Preferring mice exhibited larger successive negative contrast effects than their corresponding replicate Low Alcohol Preferring lines, providing strong evidence for a genetic association between alcohol drinking and susceptibility to the emotional effects of negative contrast. These mice can be used to study the shared neurological and genetic underpinnings of emotional reactivity and alcohol preference. Unexpectedly, an incentive downshift suppressed ethanol drinking immediately following an incentive downshift. This could be due to a specific effect of negative contrast on ethanol consumption or a suppressive effect on consummatory behavior in general. These data suggest that either alcohol intake does not provide the anticipated negative reinforcement, or that a single test was insufficient for animals to learn to drink following incentive downshift. However, the emotional intensity following incentive downshift provides initial evidence that this type of emotional reactivity may be a predisposing factor in alcoholism.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol preference; Alcoholism; Frustration; Genetic correlation; Motivation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26404495      PMCID: PMC4636452          DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2015.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  29 in total

1.  Pharmacologically relevant intake during chronic, free-choice drinking rhythms in selectively bred high alcohol-preferring mice.

Authors:  Liana M Matson; Nicholas J Grahame
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

3.  Lewis rats are more sensitive than Fischer rats to successive negative contrast, but less sensitive to the anxiolytic and appetite-stimulating effects of chlordiazepoxide.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Jason D Tesche; Dennie M Tompers; Katherine E Riegel; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Pain sensitivity and saccharin intake in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rat strains.

Authors:  A B Kampov-Polevoy; O P Kasheffskaya; D H Overstreet; A H Rezvani; I V Viglinskaya; B A Badistov; S B Seredenin; J A Halikas; J D Sinclair
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1996 Apr-May

5.  Interactive effects of the serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and stressful life events on college student drinking and drug use.

Authors:  Jonathan Covault; Howard Tennen; Stephen Armeli; Tamlin S Conner; Aryeh I Herman; Antonius H N Cillessen; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Selective breeding for high and low alcohol preference in mice.

Authors:  N J Grahame; T K Li; L Lumeng
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Human taste contrast and self-reported measures of anxiety.

Authors:  S M Specht; R C Twining
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1999-04

8.  Localization of genes affecting alcohol drinking in mice.

Authors:  T J Phillips; J C Crabbe; P Metten; J K Belknap
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Interaction between CRHR1 gene and stressful life events predicts adolescent heavy alcohol use.

Authors:  Dorothea Blomeyer; Jens Treutlein; Günter Esser; Martin H Schmidt; Gunter Schumann; Manfred Laucht
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  The effects of lorazepam on skin conductance responses to aversive stimuli in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Martin Siepmann; Benjamin Heine; Andreas Kluge; Tjalf Ziemssen; Michael Mück-Weymann; Wilhelm Kirch
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.435

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of intoxicating effects of liquor products on drunken mice.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wu; Xiaofei Tian; Songgui He; Lei Quan; Yunlu Wei; Zhenqiang Wu
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.597

2.  Juvenile stress facilitates safety learning in male and female high alcohol preferring mice.

Authors:  Iris Müller; Demitra D Adams; Susan Sangha; Julia A Chester
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Emotional Reactivity to Incentive Downshift in Adult Rats Exposed to Binge-Like Ethanol Exposure During Adolescence.

Authors:  José Manuel Lerma-Cabrera; Camilo Andrés Arévalo-Romero; Gustavo Alfredo Cortés-Toledo; Alfredo Alfonso Adriasola-Carrasco; Francisca Carvajal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.