Literature DB >> 11526088

A HOX complex, a repressor element and a 50 bp sequence confer regional specificity to a DPP-responsive enhancer.

T Marty1, M A Vigano, C Ribeiro, U Nussbaumer, N C Grieder, M Affolter.   

Abstract

A central theme during development and homeostasis is the generation of cell type-specific responses to the action of a limited number of extant signaling cascades triggered by extracellular ligands. The molecular mechanisms by which information from such signals are integrated in responding cells in a cell-type specific manner remain poorly understood. We have undertaken a detailed characterization of an enhancer that is regulated by DPP signaling and by the homeotic protein Labial and its partners, Extradenticle and Homothorax. The expression driven by this enhancer (lab550) and numerous deletions and point mutants thereof was studied in wild-type and mutant Drosophila embryos as well as in cultured cells. We find that the lab550 enhancer is composed of two elements, a Homeotic Response Element (HOMRE) and a DPP Response Element (DPPRE) that synergize. None of these two elements can reproduce the expression of lab550, either with regard to expression level or with regard to spatial restriction. The isolated DPPRE of lab550 responds extremely weakly to DPP. Interestingly, we found that the inducibility of this DPPRE is weak because it is tuned down by the action of a repressor element. This repressor element and an additional 50 bp element appear to be crucial for the cooperation of the HOMRE and the DPPRE, and might tightly link the DPP response to the homeotic input. The cooperation between the different elements of the enhancer leads to the segmentally restricted activity of lab550 in the endoderm and provides a mechanism to create specific responses to DPP signaling with the help of a HOX protein complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11526088     DOI: 10.1242/dev.128.14.2833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  13 in total

1.  Interplay between activin and Hox genes determines the formation of the kidney morphogenetic field.

Authors:  Ella Preger-Ben Noon; Hila Barak; Noga Guttmann-Raviv; Ram Reshef
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Epigenome-wide DNA methylation landscape of melanoma progression to brain metastasis reveals aberrations on homeobox D cluster associated with prognosis.

Authors:  Diego M Marzese; Richard A Scolyer; Jamie L Huynh; Sharon K Huang; Hajime Hirose; Kelly K Chong; Eiji Kiyohara; Jinhua Wang; Neal P Kawas; Nicholas C Donovan; Keisuke Hata; James S Wilmott; Rajmohan Murali; Michael E Buckland; Brindha Shivalingam; John F Thompson; Donald L Morton; Daniel F Kelly; Dave S B Hoon
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Conservation of regulatory sequences and gene expression patterns in the disintegrating Drosophila Hox gene complex.

Authors:  Bárbara Negre; Sònia Casillas; Magali Suzanne; Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero; Michael Akam; Michael Nefedov; Antonio Barbadilla; Pieter de Jong; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Dissecting the functional specificities of two Hox proteins.

Authors:  Rohit Joshi; Liping Sun; Richard Mann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  A conserved activation element in BMP signaling during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Alexander Weiss; Enrica Charbonnier; Elín Ellertsdóttir; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Christian Wolf; Reinhard Schuh; George Pyrowolakis; Markus Affolter
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  GATA- and Smad1-dependent enhancers in the Smad7 gene differentially interpret bone morphogenetic protein concentrations.

Authors:  Hassina Benchabane; Jeffrey L Wrana
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators.

Authors:  Richard S Mann; Katherine M Lelli; Rohit Joshi
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  XMeis3 is necessary for mesodermal Hox gene expression and function.

Authors:  Paul M J In der Rieden; Hans J Jansen; Antony J Durston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Directed neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells is a sensitive system for the identification of novel Hox gene effectors.

Authors:  Myrto Bami; Vasso Episkopou; Anthony Gavalas; Mina Gouti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  FoxK mediates TGF-beta signalling during midgut differentiation in flies.

Authors:  Sergio Casas-Tinto; Melisa Gomez-Velazquez; Begoña Granadino; Pedro Fernandez-Funez
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.