Literature DB >> 11524646

Can paramedics using guidelines accurately triage patients?

J E Pointer1, M A Levitt, J C Young, S B Promes, B J Messana, M E Adèr.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We determine whether paramedics, using written guidelines, can accurately triage patients in the field.
METHODS: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted at an urban county emergency medical services (EMS) system and county hospital. Paramedics triaged patients, for study purposes only, according to 4 categories: (1) needing to come to the emergency department by advanced life support (ALS) transport, (2) needing to come to the ED by any transport, (3) needing to see a physician within 24 hours, or (4) not needing any further physician evaluation. Medical records that provided patient treatment information to the point of ED disposition were subsequently reviewed (blinded to the paramedic rating) to determine which of the categories was appropriate. The protocol of the EMS system of the study site dictates that all patients should be transported except for those who refuse care and leave against medical advice. Only transported patients were included in the present study. Fifty-four paramedics triaged 1,180 patients.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 43.4+/-17 years; 62.0% were male. Paramedics rated 1,000 (84.7%) of the patients as needing to come to the ED and 180 (15.3%) as not needing to come to the ED. Ratings according to triage category were as follows: 804 (68.1%) category 1, 196 (16.6%) category 2, 148 (12.5%) category 3, and 32 (2.7%) category 4. Seven hundred thirty-six (62.4%) patients were discharged, 298 (25.3%) were admitted, 90 (7.6%) were transferred, 36 (3.1%) left against medical advice, and 20 (1.7%) died. The review panel determined that 113 (9.6%) patients were undertriaged; 55 (48.7%) of these patients were misclassified because the paramedics misused the guidelines. Ninety-nine patients (8.4% of the total sample) were incorrectly classified as not needing to come to the ED. This represented 55% of the patients (99/180) categorized as 3 or 4 by the paramedics. Fourteen patients (1.2% of total) were incorrectly classified as category 4 instead of 3. Of the 113 undertriaged patients, 22 (19.6%) were admitted, 86 (76.1%) were discharged, and 4 (3.5%) were transferred.
CONCLUSION: Paramedics using written guidelines fall short of an acceptable level of triage accuracy to determine disposition of patients in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11524646     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.117198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  12 in total

1.  Medically unnecessary emergency medical services (EMS) transports among children ages 0 to 17 years.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Elizabeth G Baxley; Janice C Probst; James R Hussey; Charity G Moore
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-07-01

2.  Development of an accelerated MSCT protocol (Triage MSCT) for mass casualty incidents: comparison to MSCT for single-trauma patients.

Authors:  M Körner; M Krötz; K-G Kanz; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser; U Linsenmaier
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30

3.  Validation of triage criteria for deciding which apparently inebriated persons require emergency department care.

Authors:  Keith Flower; Anneke Post; Jeremy Sussman; Niels Tangherlini; John Mendelson; Mark J Pletcher
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Redirecting emergency medical services patients with unmet primary care needs: the perspective of paramedics on feasibility and acceptance of an alternative care path in a qualitative investigation from Berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Sarah Oslislo; Lisa Kümpel; Rebecca Resendiz Cantu; Christoph Heintze; Martin Möckel; Felix Holzinger
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-11

5.  A comparative assessment of adverse event classification in the out-of-hospital setting.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Judith R Lave; Matthew D Weaver; Francis X Guyette; Robert M Arnold; Christian Martin-Gill; Jon C Rittenberger; David Krackhardt; Vincent N Mosesso; Ronald N Roth; Richard J Wadas; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Can Medical Decision-making at the Scene by EMS Staff Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Ambulance Transportations, but Still Be Safe?

Authors:  Mahmoudreza Peyravi; Per Örtenwall; Amir Khorram-Manesh
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Telehealth-Enabled Emergency Medical Services Program Reduces Ambulance Transport to Urban Emergency Departments.

Authors:  James R Langabeer; Michael Gonzalez; Diaa Alqusairi; Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer; Adria Jackson; Jennifer Mikhail; David Persse
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-06

8.  Using genetic algorithms to optimise current and future health planning--the example of ambulance locations.

Authors:  Satoshi Sasaki; Alexis J Comber; Hiroshi Suzuki; Chris Brunsdon
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Prehospital score for acute disease: a community-based observational study in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Toyoda; Yoshio Matsuo; Yoshio Mastuo; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hidekazu Fujiwara; Toshio Takatorige; Hiroyasu Iso
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2007-10-15

10.  Piloting data linkage in a prospective cohort study of a GP referral scheme to avoid unnecessary emergency department conveyance.

Authors:  Joanna M Blodgett; Duncan J Robertson; David Ratcliffe; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.