Literature DB >> 16733685

Development of an accelerated MSCT protocol (Triage MSCT) for mass casualty incidents: comparison to MSCT for single-trauma patients.

M Körner1, M Krötz, K-G Kanz, K-J Pfeifer, M Reiser, U Linsenmaier.   

Abstract

During multiple casualty incidents (MCI) emergency radiology departments have to deal with a large number of patients with suspected severe trauma within a short period of time. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable accelerated multislice computed tomography (MSCT) protocol to increase patient throughput for this kind of emergency situation. We presumed a scenario of 15 patients being admitted to the trauma service with suspicion of severe injuries after a MCI over a period of 2 h. An accelerated Triage MSCT protocol was developed and evaluated for MSCT scanner productivity (patients per hour) and time (minutes) needed for a total MSCT body workup using an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, time (minutes) for transfer and preparation was measured. These timeframes were compared to a control group consisting of 144 single patients with multiple trauma undergoing standard MSCT according to our trauma room protocol. All MSCT studies were conducted using a 4-detector row scanner. (1) For the study group (Triage MSCT), average time for patient transfer and preparation was 2.9 min (2.5-4.3 min), mean CT examination time was 2.1 min (1.7-2.4 min); image reconstruction took 4.0 min (3.3-4.3 min). Total time in scanner room was 8.9 min (7.7-11.3 min), resulting in a maximal productivity of 6.7 patients per hour. Image transfer to the digital picture archive and communication system archive was completed after an average 9.5 min (8.9-10.8 min). (2) For the control group (single casualty MSCT), the mean time for patient transfer and preparation was 20.4 min (9.0-39.2 min), mean examination time was 6.0 min (3.1-11.3 min). Times for image reconstructions were not recorded in the patient series. Mean total time in scanner room was 25.3 min (11.0-72.4 min), resulting in a patient throughput of 2.4 patients per hour. MSCT has potential to serve as a powerful tool in triage of multiple casualty patients. The introduction of a Triage MSCT scanning protocol resulted in an increase of patient throughput per hour by a factor of almost 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16733685     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-006-0485-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  45 in total

1.  Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries?

Authors:  Pierre A Poletti; Karen Kinkel; Bernard Vermeulen; François Irmay; Pierre-François Unger; François Terrier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Mass-casualty, terrorist bombings: epidemiological outcomes, resource utilization, and time course of emergency needs (Part I).

Authors:  Jeffrey L Arnold; Ming-Che Tsai; Pinchas Halpern; Howard Smithline; Edita Stok; Gurkan Ersoy
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.040

3.  Principles of mass casualty management following terrorist disasters.

Authors:  Eric R Frykberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  How does casualty load affect trauma care in urban bombing incidents? A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Asher Hirshberg; Bradford G Scott; Thomas Granchi; Matthew J Wall; Kenneth L Mattox; Michael Stein
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-04

5.  Evacuation priorities in mass casualty terror-related events: implications for contingency planning.

Authors:  Sharon Einav; Zvi Feigenberg; Charles Weissman; Daniel Zaichik; Guy Caspi; Doron Kotler; Herbert R Freund
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Mass-casualty, terrorist bombings: implications for emergency department and hospital emergency response (Part II).

Authors:  Pinchas Halpern; Ming-Che Tsai; Jeffrey L Arnold; Edita Stok; Gurkan Ersoy
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.040

7.  Large-scale urban disaster drill involving an explosion: lessons learned by an academic medical center.

Authors:  Brian Sweeney; Edward Jasper; Eleanor Gates
Journal:  Disaster Manag Response       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  National strategy for mass casualty situations and its effects on the hospital.

Authors:  Leon Levi; Moshe Michaelson; Hanna Admi; David Bregman; Ronen Bar-Nahor
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.040

9.  [Radiologic emergency management in multiple trauma cases].

Authors:  H Häuser; K Bohndorf
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Quality improvement data analysis of a mass casualty event.

Authors:  Mohammed Y Al-Naami; Ahmed A Al-Faki; Ali A Sadik
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  12 in total

1.  Analysis of responses of radiology personnel to a simulated mass casualty incident after the implementation of an automated alarm system in hospital emergency planning.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Lucas L Geyer; Stefan Wirth; Claus-Dieter Meisel; Maximilian F Reiser; Ulrich Linsenmaier
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01

2.  Radiological mass casualty incident (MCI) workflow analysis: single-centre data of a mid-scale exercise.

Authors:  Fabian G Mueck; Kathrin Wirth; Maximilian Muggenthaler; Uwe Kreimeier; Lucas Geyer; Karl-Georg Kanz; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Stefan Wirth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Emergency imaging after a mass casualty incident: role of the radiology department during training for and activation of a disaster management plan.

Authors:  Ferco H Berger; Markus Körner; Mark P Bernstein; Aaron D Sodickson; Ludo F Beenen; Patrick D McLaughlin; Digna R Kool; Ronald M Bilow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [Imaging of trauma with multi-detector computed tomography].

Authors:  M Körner; M Reiser; U Linsenmaier
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Evaluation of a CT triage protocol for mass casualty incidents: results from two large-scale exercises.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Michael M Krötz; Stefan Wirth; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Karl-Georg Kanz; Holger F Boehm; Maximilian Reiser; Ulrich Linsenmaier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; John A Bonavita; Mark P Foran; Brent W Matza; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03

7.  [Pretreatment mass casualty incident workflow analysis : Comparison of two level 1 trauma centers].

Authors:  F Mück; K Wirth; M Muggenthaler; K G Kanz; U Kreimeier; D Maxien; U Linsenmeier; W Mutschler; S Wirth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Emergency radiology and mass casualty incidents-report of a mass casualty incident at a level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  Ferdia Bolster; Ken Linnau; Steve Mitchell; Eric Roberge; Quynh Nguyen; Jeffrey Robinson; Bruce Lehnert; Joel Gross
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-09-13

Review 9.  Systematic review of strategies to manage and allocate scarce resources during mass casualty events.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Jeanne S Ringel; D Steven Fox; Francesca Pillemer; Daniel A Waxman; Melinda Moore; Cynthia K Hansen; Ann R Knebel; Richard Ricciardi; Arthur L Kellermann
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  [Importance of multidetector CT imaging in multiple trauma].

Authors:  U Linsenmaier; L L Geyer; M Körner; M Reiser; S Wirth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.