Literature DB >> 11523784

Identification of genes required for growth under ethanol stress using transposon mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

T Takahashi1, H Shimoi, K Ito.   

Abstract

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibits high ethanol tolerance compared with other microorganisms. The mechanism of ethanol tolerance in yeast is thought to be regulated by many genes. To identify some of these genes, we screened for ethanol-sensitive S. cerevisiae strains among a collection of mutants obtained using transposon mutagenesis. Five ethanol-sensitive (ets) mutants were isolated from approximately 7,000 mutants created by transforming yeast cells with a transposon (mTn-lacZ/LEU2)-mutagenized genomic library. Although these mutants grew normally in a rich medium, they could not grow in the same medium containing 6% ethanol. Sequence analysis of the ets mutants revealed that the transposon was inserted in the coding regions of BEM2, PAT1, ROM2, VPS34 and ADA2. We constructed deletion mutants for these genes by a PCR-directed disruption method and confirmed that the disruptants, like the ets mutants, were ethanol sensitive. Thus, these five genes are indeed required for growth under ethanol stress. These mutants were also more sensitive than normal cells to Calcofluor white, a drug that affects cell wall architecture, and Zymolyase, a yeast lytic enzyme containing mainly beta-1,3- glucanase, indicating that the integrity of the cell wall plays an important role in ethanol tolerance in S. cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523784     DOI: 10.1007/s004380100510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  23 in total

1.  Stress proteins in the cytoplasmic membrane fraction of Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  D Petráčková; L Semberová; P Halada; P Svoboda; J Svobodová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 2.  How do yeast cells become tolerant to high ethanol concentrations?

Authors:  Tim Snoek; Kevin J Verstrepen; Karin Voordeckers
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Two different Drosophila ADA2 homologues are present in distinct GCN5 histone acetyltransferase-containing complexes.

Authors:  Selen Muratoglu; Sofia Georgieva; Gábor Pápai; Elisabeth Scheer; Izzet Enünlü; Orbán Komonyi; Imre Cserpán; Lubov Lebedeva; Elena Nabirochkina; Andor Udvardy; László Tora; Imre Boros
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Turbidostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A under selective pressure elicited by ethanol selects for mutations in SSD1 and UTH1.

Authors:  Liat Avrahami-Moyal; David Engelberg; Jared W Wenger; Gavin Sherlock; Sergei Braun
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Genetic dissection of ethanol tolerance in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  X H Hu; M H Wang; T Tan; J R Li; H Yang; L Leach; R M Zhang; Z W Luo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Global gene expression analysis of yeast cells during sake brewing.

Authors:  Hong Wu; Xiaohong Zheng; Yoshio Araki; Hiroshi Sahara; Hiroshi Takagi; Hitoshi Shimoi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Physiological and transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to d-limonene show changes to the cell wall but not to the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Timothy C R Brennan; Jens O Krömer; Lars K Nielsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Evidence for a Role for the Plasma Membrane in the Nanomechanical Properties of the Cell Wall as Revealed by an Atomic Force Microscopy Study of the Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Ethanol Stress.

Authors:  Marion Schiavone; Cécile Formosa-Dague; Carolina Elsztein; Marie-Ange Teste; Helene Martin-Yken; Marcos A De Morais; Etienne Dague; Jean M François
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Cdk1 and SUMO regulate Swe1 stability.

Authors:  Kobi J Simpson-Lavy; Michael Brandeis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Defects in Protein Folding Machinery Affect Cell Wall Integrity and Reduce Ethanol Tolerance in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aswathy Narayanan; Dileep Pullepu; Praveen Kumar Reddy; Wasim Uddin; M Anaul Kabir
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.