Literature DB >> 11523072

Applying sample survey methods to clinical trials data.

L M LaVange1, G G Koch, T A Schwartz.   

Abstract

This paper outlines the utility of statistical methods for sample surveys in analysing clinical trials data. Sample survey statisticians face a variety of complex data analysis issues deriving from the use of multi-stage probability sampling from finite populations. One such issue is that of clustering of observations at the various stages of sampling. Survey data analysis approaches developed to accommodate clustering in the sample design have more general application to clinical studies in which repeated measures structures are encountered. Situations where these methods are of interest include multi-visit studies where responses are observed at two or more time points for each patient, multi-period cross-over studies, and epidemiological studies for repeated occurrences of adverse events or illnesses. We describe statistical procedures for fitting multiple regression models to sample survey data that are more effective for repeated measures studies with complicated data structures than the more traditional approaches of multivariate repeated measures analysis. In this setting, one can specify a primary sampling unit within which repeated measures have intraclass correlation. This intraclass correlation is taken into account by sample survey regression methods through robust estimates of the standard errors of the regression coefficients. Regression estimates are obtained from model fitting estimation equations which ignore the correlation structure of the data (that is, computing procedures which assume that all observational units are independent or are from simple random samples). The analytic approach is straightforward to apply with logistic models for dichotomous data, proportional odds models for ordinal data, and linear models for continuously scaled data, and results are interpretable in terms of population average parameters. Through the features summarized here, the sample survey regression methods have many similarities to the broader family of methods based on generalized estimating equations (GEE). Sample survey methods for the analysis of time-to-event data have more recently been developed and implemented in the context of finite probability sampling. Given the importance of survival endpoints in late phase studies for drug development, these methods have clear utility in the area of clinical trials data analysis. A brief overview of methods for sample survey data analysis is first provided, followed by motivation for applying these methods to clinical trials data. Examples drawn from three clinical studies are provided to illustrate survey methods for logistic regression, proportional odds regression and proportional hazards regression. Potential problems with the proposed methods and ways of addressing them are discussed. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523072     DOI: 10.1002/sim.732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

Review 1.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments.

Authors:  David M Murray; Sherri P Varnell; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The Effects of Mexican origin family structure on parental monitoring and pre-adolescent substance use expectancies and substance use.

Authors:  Jennifer R Warren; David A Wagstaff; Michael L Hecht; Elvira Elek
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2008-01-01

3.  Mental health and readiness to change smoking behavior in daily smoking primary care patients.

Authors:  Gudrun Schorr; Sabina Ulbricht; Sebastian E Baumeister; Jeannette Rüge; Janina Grothues; Hans-Jürgen Rumpf; Ulrich John; Christian Meyer
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009

4.  Proposal of objective morphological classification system for hepatocellular carcinoma using preoperative multiphase computed tomography.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakayama; Tadatoshi Takayama; Takao Okubo; Tokio Higaki; Yutaka Midorikawa; Masamichi Moriguchi; Akiyoshi Itoh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science.

Authors:  Emily B Falk; Luke W Hyde; Colter Mitchell; Jessica Faul; Richard Gonzalez; Mary M Heitzeg; Daniel P Keating; Kenneth M Langa; Meghan E Martz; Julie Maslowsky; Frederick J Morrison; Douglas C Noll; Megan E Patrick; Fabian T Pfeffer; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Moriah E Thomason; Pamela Davis-Kean; Christopher S Monk; John Schulenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior among US Hispanic/Latino Youth: The SOL Youth Study.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Elva M Arredondo; Mercedes R Carnethon; Alan M Delamater; Linda C Gallo; Carmen R Isasi; Krista M Perreira; Samantha A Foti; Linda VAN Horn; Denise C Vidot; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Use of reproductive and sexual health services among female family planning clinic clients exposed to partner violence and reproductive coercion.

Authors:  Traci Kazmerski; Heather L McCauley; Kelley Jones; Sonya Borrero; Jay G Silverman; Michele R Decker; Daniel Tancredi; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

8.  Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Cohort Analyses: A Kernel Weighting Approach.

Authors:  Lingxiao Wang; Barry I Graubard; Hormuzd A Katki; Yan Li
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 9.  Models to identify treatments for the acute and persistent effects of seizure-inducing chemical threat agents.

Authors:  Isaac N Pessah; Michael A Rogawski; Daniel J Tancredi; Heike Wulff; Dorota Zolkowska; Donald A Bruun; Bruce D Hammock; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Mexican-heritage preadolescents' ethnic identification and perceptions of substance use.

Authors:  Khadidiatou Ndiaye; Michael L Hecht; David A Wagstaff; Elvira Elek
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.