Literature DB >> 11522968

Comparison of methylene blue-directed biopsies and conventional biopsies in the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a preliminary study.

J M Wo1, M B Ray, S Mayfield-Stokes, G Al-Sabbagh, F Gebrail, S P Slone, M A Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic advantage of methylene blue (MB) chromoendoscopy in Barrett's esophagus is unclear.
METHODS: Patients with columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) were enrolled into a prospective, randomized crossover trial of MB-directed biopsy versus conventional biopsy.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (19 long-segment CLE; 28 short-segment CLE) were enrolled and underwent MB-directed biopsy. Sensitivity and specificity of MB for specialized intestinal metaplasia were 53% and 51%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of MB for dysplasia were 51% and 48%, respectively. Thirty-five patients (15 long-segment CLE; 20 short-segment CLE) completed the crossover trial. Relative frequencies for specialized intestinal metaplasia were 73% and 71% from MB-directed and conventional biopsy specimens, respectively (p = 0.73). Relative frequencies for dysplasia were 20% and 18% from MB-directed and conventional biopsy specimens, respectively (p = 0.65). In patients with long-segment CLE, dysplasia was diagnosed in 10 patients with MB and 7 patients with conventional biopsy methods (p = 0.25). The number of biopsy specimens per EGD was greater with MB, which may have influenced the diagnosis. Histologically, the grade of dysplasia was indefinite/low in nearly all of the dysplastic specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of MB-directed biopsy were similar to conventional biopsy in detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia and indefinite/low-grade dysplasia. MB was not useful in short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11522968     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.115732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  22 in total

1.  S, m, l, xl.

Authors:  T Wang; G Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Magnification endoscopy, high resolution endoscopy, and chromoscopy; towards a better optical diagnosis.

Authors:  M J Bruno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett's oesophagus: a review on current practice.

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; SweeLin Chen Yi Mei; Sandeep Sethi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Barrett's esophagus--Who, how, how often and what to do with dysplasia?

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Classification of histological severity of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis by confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Rui Ji; Tao Yu; Xiu-Li Zuo; Cheng-Jun Zhou; Chang-Qing Li; Zhen Li; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Barrett esophagus: histology and pathology for the clinician.

Authors:  Robert D Odze
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 7.  Emerging optical methods for surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Matthew B Sturm; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Barrett's Esophagus: Diagnosis, Screening, Surveillance, and Controversies.

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; Krish Ragunath; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Confocal endomicroscopy (CEM) improves efficiency of Barrett surveillance.

Authors:  Vien X Nguyen; Cuong C Nguyen; Giovanni De Petris; Virender K Sharma; Ananya Das
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.