Literature DB >> 11521455

The age pattern of fecundability: an analysis of French Canadian and Hutterite birth histories.

U Larsen1, S Yan.   

Abstract

This paper analyzes the age pattern of effective fecundability from populations with no evidence of deliberate fertility control using a new convolution model of fecundability. The analysis is based on a sample of Hutterite birth histories from the mid-20th century, and birth histories of French Canadians from the 17th and 18th centuries. The main findings are as follows: 1) the level of effective fecundability is higher among the French Canadians compared to the Hutterites; 2) effective fecundability peaks at age 20 for the Hutterites, and in the early to mid-20s for the French Canadians; 3) Hutterite effective fecundability declines almost linearly from age 20 to 45, and French Canadian effective fecundability declines slowly from its peak to the early 30s, and more rapidly at older ages; and 4) the duration of postpartum amenorrhea is longer for the French Canadians than for the Hutterites. Because of the shorter periods of postpartum amenorrhea the Hutterites have about the same average number of children as the French Canadians, even though the French Canadians have higher effective fecundability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11521455     DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2000.9989008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Biol        ISSN: 0037-766X


  7 in total

1.  Age and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.

Authors:  Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik T Sørensen; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Too old to have children? Lessons from natural fertility populations.

Authors:  Marinus J C Eijkemans; Frans van Poppel; Dik F Habbema; Ken R Smith; Henri Leridon; Egbert R te Velde
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Decreased clinical pregnancy and live birth rates after short interval from delivery to subsequent assisted reproductive treatment cycle.

Authors:  Molly M Quinn; Mitchell P Rosen; Isabel Elaine Allen; Heather G Huddleston; Marcelle I Cedars; Victor Y Fujimoto
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  The current situation and future directions for the study on time-to-pregnancy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Xiang Hong; Jiechen Yin; Wei Wang; Fanqi Zhao; Hong Yu; Bei Wang
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.355

5.  Volitional determinants and age-related decline in fecundability: a general population prospective cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise; Henrik T Sørensen; Anders H Riis; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Anogenital distance, male factor infertility and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Fie Madvig; Marc Künkel Pedersen; Stine Kjaer Urhoj; Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner; Niels Jørgensen; Laerke Priskorn
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.456

7.  Lower total motile count is associated with smaller historic intergenerational family size: a pedigree analysis from the Utah Population Database.

Authors:  Darshan P Patel; Huong T Meeks; Heidi A Hanson; Alexander W Pastuszak; James M Hotaling; Ken R Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.412

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.