Literature DB >> 11520761

Quantification of the ultraviolet radiation (UVR) field in the human eye in vivo using novel instrumentation and the potential benefits of UVR blocking hydrogel contact lens.

J E Walsh1, J P Bergmanson, D Wallace, G Saldana, H Dempsey, H McEvoy, L M Collum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Certain degenerative eye conditions occur predominantly nasally, at the limbal region, and are associated with solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) induced damage. The relative contribution to the in vivo ocular flux of (a) the reflection of UVR incident on the skin of the nose onto the nasal limbus, and (b) the focusing of UVR incident on the temporal side of the cornea onto the nasal limbus were examined.
METHODS: A novel photodiode sensor array was used to measure the UVR field across the eye. In addition, a novel spectrometer set-up was used to measure the spectrum of radiation refracted across the cornea. The efficacy of UVR blocking hydrogel contact lenses in filtering incident UVR was assessed in vivo.
RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative data indicated an increase nasally of UVR. Photodiode readings showed a net UVR increase from the temporal to the nasal side. Transmission curves showed that most UVR incident on the limbal region is either absorbed by, or transmitted through, the ocular tissues. This radiation is filtered by UVR blocking soft contact lens.
CONCLUSIONS: An increased UVR flux on the nasal side of the eye, due to reflection off the nasal skin, was identified in vivo. Any UVR passing through the cornea is either absorbed by the conjunctiva and/or transmitted through it onto the sclera where it is absorbed. UVR blocking hydrogel contact lenses can eliminate these sources of UVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11520761      PMCID: PMC1724131          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.9.1080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  24 in total

1.  Sun exposure and pterygium of the eye: a dose-response curve.

Authors:  T J Threlfall; D R English
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Ultraviolet-induced photochemical damage in ocular tissues.

Authors:  J A Zuclich
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Pterygium surgery in Victoria: a survey of ophthalmologists.

Authors:  G R Snibson; C D Luu; H R Taylor
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-11

4.  Basal cell carcinoma of the eyelids and solar ultraviolet radiation exposure.

Authors:  G Lindgren; B L Diffey; O Larkö
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Epidemiology of pterygium in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  C A McCarty; C L Fu; H R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Expression of the bcl-2 protooncogene in the cycling adult mouse hair follicle.

Authors:  K S Stenn; L Lawrence; D Veis; S Korsmeyer; M Seiberg
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  The effect of rigid gas permeable contact lens wear on proliferation of rabbit corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells.

Authors:  D H Ren; W M Petroll; J V Jester; H D Cavanagh
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1999-07

8.  Corneal damage in photokeratitis--why is it so painful?

Authors:  J P Bergmanson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Corneal changes associated with chronic UV irradiation.

Authors:  H R Taylor; S K West; F S Rosenthal; B Munoz; H S Newland; E A Emmett
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-10

10.  Suntan, sunburn, and pigmentation factors and the frequency of acquired melanocytic nevi in children. Similarities to melanoma: the Vancouver Mole Study.

Authors:  R P Gallagher; D I McLean; C P Yang; A J Coldman; H K Silver; J J Spinelli; M Beagrie
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1990-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  A class I (Senofilcon A) soft contact lens prevents UVB-induced ocular effects, including cataract, in the rabbit in vivo.

Authors:  Frank J Giblin; Li-Ren Lin; Victor R Leverenz; Loan Dang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Distribution of conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence in a population-based study: the Norfolk Island Eye Study.

Authors:  J C Sherwin; A W Hewitt; L S Kearns; M T Coroneo; L R Griffiths; D A Mackey
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Efficiency of ocular UV protection by clear lenses.

Authors:  Katharina Rifai; Matthias Hornauer; Ramona Buechinger; Roland Schoen; Maria Barraza-Bernal; Selam Habtegiorgis; Carsten Glasenapp; Siegfried Wahl; Timo Mappes
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Do UV-blocking Soft Contact Lenses Meet ANSI Z80.20 Criteria for UV Transmittance?

Authors:  Saeed Rahmani; Mohadeseh Mohammadi Nia; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Mohammadreza Nazari; Mohammad Ghassemi-Broumand
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  UV Protection in the Cornea: Failure and Rescue.

Authors:  Thomas Volatier; Björn Schumacher; Claus Cursiefen; Maria Notara
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

6.  Assessing Human Eye Exposure to UV Light: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Michele Marro; Laurent Moccozet; David Vernez
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Ultraviolet damage to the eye revisited: eye-sun protection factor (E-SPF®), a new ultraviolet protection label for eyewear.

Authors:  Francine Behar-Cohen; Gilles Baillet; Tito de Ayguavives; Paula Ortega Garcia; Jean Krutmann; Pablo Peña-García; Charlotte Reme; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.