Literature DB >> 11520724

Effectiveness of CPAP treatment in daytime function in sleep apnea syndrome: a randomized controlled study with an optimized placebo.

J M Montserrat1, M Ferrer, L Hernandez, R Farré, G Vilagut, D Navajas, J R Badia, E Carrasco, J De Pablo, E Ballester.   

Abstract

Application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as the standard treatment for sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) is a moot point. Studies on the effectiveness of this treatment have been challenged because of the lack of a suitable placebo. The recent description of a true placebo (sham CPAP) prompted us to conduct a randomized trial of CPAP or placebo to assess the effectiveness of CPAP in improving SAHS-related symptoms and daytime function in patients with moderate to severe SAHS. Forty-eight patients, stratified in four groups according to severity, were randomly allocated into two treatment groups (optimal and sham CPAP) for a 6-wk period. Of these, 45 completed follow-up (91% males; age: 54 +/- 10 yr; body mass index [BMI]: 32 +/- 6 kg/m(2); apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]: 54 +/- 19 events/h; and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]: 16 +/- 5). The ESS, a questionnaire on SAHS-related symptoms, Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were completed at inclusion and after treatment. After 10 d of washout, the placebo group was treated with optimal CPAP and reassessed before and after optimal CPAP. The group receiving optimal CPAP when compared with the group with sham CPAP showed considerably greater improvement in the relief of sleepiness (-9.5 versus -2.3, p < 0.001), other SAHS-related symptoms (-18.5 versus -4.5, p < 0.001), vigilance (+8.5 versus +3.4, p = 0.009), and general productivity (+4.0 versus +0.5, p = 0.04) FOSQ scales. Both groups used a similar number of hours for the optimal and the sham CPAP (4.3 versus 4.5, (p = NS). The patients initially treated with placebo CPAP improved significantly more when optimal CPAP was applied for ESS (-2.3 versus -6.7, p < 0.001) and other sleep apnea syndrome (SAS)-related symptoms (-4.5 versus -11.2, p = 0.02). Our study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness of CPAP treatment in improving symptoms and perceived health status in moderate to severe SAHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11520724     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.4.2006034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  85 in total

1.  CPAP treatment supported by telemedicine does not improve blood pressure in high cardiovascular risk OSA patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Monique Mendelson; Isabelle Vivodtzev; Renaud Tamisier; David Laplaud; Sonia Dias-Domingos; Jean-Philippe Baguet; Laurent Moreau; Christian Koltes; Léonidas Chavez; Gilles De Lamberterie; Frédéric Herengt; Patrick Levy; Patrice Flore; Jean-Louis Pépin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  An official American Thoracic Society statement: continuous positive airway pressure adherence tracking systems. The optimal monitoring strategies and outcome measures in adults.

Authors:  Richard J Schwab; Safwan M Badr; Lawrence J Epstein; Peter C Gay; David Gozal; Malcolm Kohler; Patrick Lévy; Atul Malhotra; Barbara A Phillips; Ilene M Rosen; Kingman P Strohl; Patrick J Strollo; Edward M Weaver; Terri E Weaver
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Sleep.7: positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  P Gordon; M H Sanders
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Positive pressure therapy: a perspective on evidence-based outcomes and methods of application.

Authors:  Mark H Sanders; Josep M Montserrat; Ramon Farré; Rachel J Givelber
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-02-15

5.  USING FEEDBACK FROM NATURALISTIC DRIVING TO IMPROVE TREATMENT ADHERENCE IN DRIVERS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA.

Authors:  J Tucker Krone; Jeffrey D Dawson; Steven W Anderson; Nazan S Aksan; Jon Tippin; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des       Date:  2013

6.  Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Frank N Kjelsberg; Espen A Ruud
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Obstructive sleep apnea and oxygen therapy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanita Mehta; Tajender S Vasu; Barbara Phillips; Frances Chung
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Treatment of sleep disorders after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Richard J Castriotta; Strahil Atanasov; Mark C Wilde; Brent E Masel; Jenny M Lai; Samuel T Kuna
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Agreement between 95th percentile pressure based on a 7-night auto-adjusting positive airway pressure trial vs. equation-based predictions in sleep apnea.

Authors:  Luis Torre-Bouscoulet; Armando Castorena-Maldonado; Elodia López-Escárcega; Juan Carlos Vázquez-García; Rogelio Pérez-Padilla
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Effects of heated humidification and topical steroids on compliance, nasal symptoms, and quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome using nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  Silke Ryan; Liam S Doherty; Geraldine M Nolan; Walter T McNicholas
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.