STUDY OBJECTIVES: to analyze the agreement between effective CPAP-determined on the basis of a 7-night auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) trial at home with that obtained through 5 different predictive equations. METHODS: Data were collected from consecutive CPAP-naive patients with OSA who underwent a 7-night non-attended home-setting APAP trial. The 95th percentile APAP pressure was considered as the effective CPAP and also as the reference variable against which the equation-based predictions were compared. All patients fulfilled the following criteria: residual respiratory disturbances index (RDI) < 10 events/h, average air leak < 0.4 L/sec and > 4 h of use per night during the APAP trial. RESULTS: A total of 100 consecutive patients (70 men) with the following characteristics were included: mean age 49 +/- 11 years, body mass index 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, diagnostic Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 14 +/- 7, diagnostic RDI 56 +/- 28 events/h, 95th percentile APAP 11 +/- 2 cm H2O, hours of use per night 6.2 +/- 1.3, and residual RDI 5 +/- 2 events/h. A poor level of agreement between the 95th percentile pressure and the pressures obtained through 5 predictive equations was observed (the intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.17 to 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The disagreement observed between the effective CPAP determined through a 7-night APAP trial and the pressures obtained by the predictive equations suggest that long-term CPAP prescriptions based on predictive equations may be improper.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: to analyze the agreement between effective CPAP-determined on the basis of a 7-night auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) trial at home with that obtained through 5 different predictive equations. METHODS: Data were collected from consecutive CPAP-naive patients with OSA who underwent a 7-night non-attended home-setting APAP trial. The 95th percentile APAP pressure was considered as the effective CPAP and also as the reference variable against which the equation-based predictions were compared. All patients fulfilled the following criteria: residual respiratory disturbances index (RDI) < 10 events/h, average air leak < 0.4 L/sec and > 4 h of use per night during the APAP trial. RESULTS: A total of 100 consecutive patients (70 men) with the following characteristics were included: mean age 49 +/- 11 years, body mass index 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, diagnostic Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 14 +/- 7, diagnostic RDI 56 +/- 28 events/h, 95th percentile APAP 11 +/- 2 cm H2O, hours of use per night 6.2 +/- 1.3, and residual RDI 5 +/- 2 events/h. A poor level of agreement between the 95th percentile pressure and the pressures obtained through 5 predictive equations was observed (the intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.17 to 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The disagreement observed between the effective CPAP determined through a 7-night APAP trial and the pressures obtained by the predictive equations suggest that long-term CPAP prescriptions based on predictive equations may be improper.
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Timothy Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Max Hirshkowitz; Sheldon Kapen; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Daniel L Loube; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Merrill Wise Journal: Sleep Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Juan F Masa; Antonio Jiménez; Joaquín Durán; Francisco Capote; Carmen Monasterio; Mercedes Mayos; Joaquín Terán; Lourdes Hernández; Ferrán Barbé; Andrés Maimó; Manuela Rubio; José M Montserrat Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-07-28 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: H M Engleman; R N Kingshott; P K Wraith; T W Mackay; I J Deary; N J Douglas Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.849