Literature DB >> 11519540

Quantification of blood flow.

D Cosgrove1, R Eckersley, M Blomley, C Harvey.   

Abstract

Traditionally, Doppler ultrasound has been used to estimate blood flow as the mean velocity multiplied by the vessel area, but this is subject to significant errors and may be difficult to perform accurately. Microbubbles, developed as contrast agents for ultrasound, were initially envisaged as useful for increasing the intensity of echoes and thus rescuing Doppler studies that were technical failures because of attenuated signals or very slow flow. However, they can act as tracers and, by analogy with isotope techniques, can be used to measure blood flow with transit-time methods which exploit both arterial and venous time-intensity data. An acceptable compromise is to acquire both a tissue intensity curve and one from the feeding artery. The transit of microbubbles across an organ or tissue can be used to estimate haemodynamic alterations, e.g. the arterialisation of the supply to the liver in malignancies and cirrhosis and the delayed arterio-venous transit in the transplant kidney during rejection. The fragility of microbubbles can be turned to advantage by being exploited to create a negative bolus by exposing a tissue slice to a high power beam. The rate of refilling of this slice by circulating microbubbles can then be followed with a low-intensity monitoring beam and the resulting rising exponential curve analysed to extract indices of both the reperfusion rate (the slope) and the fractional vascular volume (the asymptote). The product of these is a measure of true tissue perfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11519540     DOI: 10.1007/s003300100985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  [Quantification of tissue perfusion with novel ultrasound methods].

Authors:  M Krix; H-U Kauczor; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Vascular imaging with contrast-enhanced sonography for experimental use].

Authors:  M Krix; H-U Kauczor; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantification of tumor vascularity with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for early response of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Yasunori Minami; Naoya Okumura; Norio Yamamoto; Naoko Tsuji; Yuko Kono; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of the minipig: data compilation and model implementation.

Authors:  Claudia Suenderhauf; Neil Parrott
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Quantitative evaluation of viable tissue perfusion changes with contrast-enhanced greyscale ultrasound in a mouse hepatoma model following treatment with different doses of thalidomide.

Authors:  J H Zhou; W Zheng; L H Cao; M Liu; R Z Luo; F Han; P H Wu; A H Li
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C J Harvey; J Pilcher; J Richenberg; U Patel; F Frauscher
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of cervical carcinoma: perfusion pattern and relationship with tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Yong-Hong Xiong; Jing Han; Zhi-Xing Guo; Yu-Hong Li; An-Hua Li; Xiao-Qing Pei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.