Literature DB >> 11519539

Ultrasound contrast agents: clinical applications.

J A Jakobsen1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents (USCA) for intravenous injections are usually gas-filled microbubbles with a mean diameter less than that of a red blood corpuscle. There are only a few products on the market at the time of this writing, but several companies have various agents under development. This paper covers both established USCA on the market, and some new agents under clinical evaluation. The potential of improving ultrasound imaging using USCA depends on several factors. These factors include the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the products, which determine the effects they have on various ultrasound imaging techniques. Furthermore, the proper clinical application of the agents requires a combination of technical and medical knowledge by the examiner, dedicated equipment, a disease that can be diagnosed or characterised by ultrasound and USCA, and a cooperative patient. Taking into account these factors, USCA can be used for improving the detection, characterisation and follow-up of diseases of several vascular beds and parenchymal organs from head to foot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11519539     DOI: 10.1007/s003300100964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging with nucleic acid aptamers.

Authors:  H Hong; S Goel; Y Zhang; W Cai
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Imaging tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  Tony Jeswani; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents in the Study of Kidney Function in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Kambiz Kalantarinia; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Mech       Date:  2007

4.  Longitudinal characterization of local perfusion of the rat placenta using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Dylan J Lawrence; Kristie Huda; Carolyn L Bayer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  In vivo high-frequency, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of uveal melanoma in mice: imaging features and histopathologic correlations.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Hua Yang; Shin J Kang; Yanggan Wang; Geoffrey D Wang; Tonya Coulthard; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Multimodality molecular imaging of CD105 (Endoglin) expression.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Yunan Yang; Hao Hong; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2010-12-26

Review 7.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Poor sensitivity of sonography in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced liver cirrhosis: accuracy of pretransplantation sonography in 118 patients.

Authors:  Wei Chiang Liu; Jae Hoon Lim; Cheol Keun Park; Min Ju Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Soon Jin Lee; Won Jae Lee; Hyo Keun Lim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Qualitative assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced coded ultrasound: comparison with arterial phase of dynamic CT and conventional color/power Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Masahiko Koda; Yoshiko Matsunaga; Masaru Ueki; Yoshiko Maeda; Ken-ichi Mimura; Kinya Okamoto; Keiko Hosho; Yoshikazu Murawaki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Stem Cell Tracking with Nanoparticle-Based Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Fang Chen; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.