OBJECTIVE: To identify factors limiting early discharge after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and abdominal hysterectomy, in a fast track setting with emphasis on information, treatment of pain, early mobilization, and early food intake. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study of 32 unselected women allocated to either abdominal hysterectomy (n=16) or LAVH (n=16). The patients received the same information, care, and advice for the perioperative period except for an assumed 1-day hospital stay in the LAVH-group and 2 days in the abdominal group. RESULTS: Patients were discharged median 1 day (1-3) after LAVH and 2 days (2-4) after abdominal hysterectomy. Work was resumed median 23 days after abdominal hysterectomy and 28 days after LAVH (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study questions the previously proposed advantages of shortened hospitalization and convalescence after LAVH compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Further studies with active rehabilitation are needed to demonstrate real differences between laparoscopic and open hysterectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors limiting early discharge after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and abdominal hysterectomy, in a fast track setting with emphasis on information, treatment of pain, early mobilization, and early food intake. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study of 32 unselected women allocated to either abdominal hysterectomy (n=16) or LAVH (n=16). The patients received the same information, care, and advice for the perioperative period except for an assumed 1-day hospital stay in the LAVH-group and 2 days in the abdominal group. RESULTS:Patients were discharged median 1 day (1-3) after LAVH and 2 days (2-4) after abdominal hysterectomy. Work was resumed median 23 days after abdominal hysterectomy and 28 days after LAVH (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study questions the previously proposed advantages of shortened hospitalization and convalescence after LAVH compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Further studies with active rehabilitation are needed to demonstrate real differences between laparoscopic and open hysterectomy.
Authors: P Reif; T Drobnitsch; T Aigmüller; R Laky; D Ulrich; J Haas; A Bader; K Tamussino Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Suzanne J Dedden; Esther V A Bouwsma; Peggy M A J Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Judith A F Huirne Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-08-12
Authors: Susanne Reuter; Linn Woelber; Constantin C Trepte; Daniel Perez; Antonia Zapf; Sinan Cevirme; Volkmar Mueller; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Anna Jaeger Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2021-12-27 Impact factor: 2.493