Literature DB >> 11514485

Four year follow up of aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis: a link between reduction in pressure overload, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic function.

I Ikonomidis1, A Tsoukas, F Parthenakis, A Gournizakis, A Kassimatis, L Rallidis, P Nihoyannopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in left ventricular function and the impact of ventricular hypertrophy and pressure gradient early and late after aortic valve replacement in patients with isolated aortic stenosis.
DESIGN: 41 patients with isolated aortic stenosis and normal systolic function underwent cross sectional and Doppler echocardiography two months before and two weeks and four years after aortic valve replacement.
RESULTS: Early after the operation, left ventricular mass index (mean (SD)) decreased from 187 (44) g/m(2) to 179 (46) g/m(2), because of a reduction in end diastolic diameter (p < 0.05). Aortic pressure gradients were reduced, as expected. Isovolumic relaxation time was reduced from 93 (20) ms to 78 (12) ms, and deceleration time from 241 (102) ms to 205 (77) ms (p < 0.05). At four years, left ventricular mass index was further reduced to 135 (30) g/m(2) (p < 0.01) as a result of wall thickness reduction in the interventricular septum (from 14 (1.6) mm to 12 (1.4) mm, p < 0.01) and the posterior wall (from 14 (1.6) mm to 12 (1.3) mm, p < 0.01). Diastolic function, expressed by a reduction in isovolumic relaxation time from 93 (20) ms to 81 (15) ms (p < 0.01) and deceleration time from 241 (102) ms to 226 (96) ms (p < 0.05), remained improved. Prolonged isovolumic relaxation time was associated with significant septal and posterior wall hypertrophy (wall thickness > 13 mm) (p < 0.05), whereas prolonged deceleration time was related to high residual gradient (peak gradient > 30 mm Hg ) (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular diastolic function improves early after surgery for aortic stenosis in parallel with the reduction in the aortic gradient. However, prolongation of Doppler indices of myocardial relaxation and ventricular filling is observed in patients with significant left ventricular hypertrophy and a residual pressure gradient early after surgery. At four years postoperatively, diastolic function remains improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11514485      PMCID: PMC1729883          DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.3.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  32 in total

1.  THE RELATION OF AGE TO THE DURATION OF CONTRACTION, EJECTION, AND RELAXATION OF THE NORMAL HUMAN HEART.

Authors:  T R HARRISON; K DIXON; R O RUSSELL; P S BIDWAI; H N COLEMAN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Doppler evaluation of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valves: data from four models in 107 stable, ambulatory patients.

Authors:  M L Ramirez; M Wong; N Sadler; P M Shah
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Patterns of diastolic dysfunction in left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  L M Shapiro; D G Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-04

Review 4.  Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: clinical relevance and recent Doppler echocardiographic insights.

Authors:  A J Labovitz; A C Pearson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Diastolic function in patients with aortic stenosis: influence of left ventricular load reduction.

Authors:  D J Diver; H D Royal; J M Aroesty; R G McKay; J J Ferguson; S E Warren; B H Lorell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Myocardial function.

Authors:  H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Load independence of the rate of isovolumic relaxation in man.

Authors:  M R Starling; D G Montgomery; G B Mancini; R A Walsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Diastolic stiffness and myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before and after valve replacement.

Authors:  O M Hess; M Ritter; J Schneider; J Grimm; M Turina; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Assessment of diastolic function in normal and hypertrophied hearts: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and M-mode echocardiography.

Authors:  A C Pearson; A J Labovitz; D Mrosek; G A Williams; H L Kennedy
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Demonstration of an imbalance between coronary perfusion and excessive load as a mechanism of ischemia during stress in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M L Smucker; C L Tedesco; S B Manning; R M Owen; M D Feldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  11 in total

1.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

2.  Association Between Diastolic Dysfunction and Health Status Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ali O Malik; Mohamed Omer; Mathew C Pflederer; Ahmed Almomani; Kensey L Gosch; Philip G Jones; Poghni A Peri-Okonny; Firas Al Badarin; Hunter A Brandt; Suzanne V Arnold; Michael L Main; David J Cohen; John A Spertus; Adnan K Chhatriwalla
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Muscle ring finger 1 mediates cardiac atrophy in vivo.

Authors:  Monte S Willis; Mauricio Rojas; Luge Li; Craig H Selzman; Ru-Hang Tang; William E Stansfield; Jessica E Rodriguez; David J Glass; Cam Patterson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Myocardial hypertrophy and its role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Frank R Heinzel; Felix Hohendanner; Ge Jin; Simon Sedej; Frank Edelmann
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-07-16

5.  Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Suad Catovic; Zoran B Popovic; Nebojsa Tasic; Dusko Nezic; Predrag Milojevic; Bosko Djukanovic; Sinisa Gradinac; Lazar Angelkov; Petar Otasevic
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 6.  Factors affecting left ventricular remodeling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. An overview.

Authors:  Emmanuel Villa; Giovanni Troise; Marco Cirillo; Federico Brunelli; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Zen Mhagna; Giordano Tasca; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on left ventricular mass and global longitudinal strain: tissue Doppler and strain evaluation.

Authors:  E Vizzardi; E Sciatti; I Bonadei; R Rovetta; A D'Aloia; S Gelsomino; R Lorusso; F Ettori; M Metra
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2014

Review 8.  Mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Antonio Nenna; Irina Timofeeva; Christos Mihos; Federico Gentile; Massimo Chello
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Alessio La Manna; Alessandra Sanfilippo; Davide Capodanno; Antonella Salemi; Alessandra Cadoni; Irene Cascone; Gesualdo Polizzi; Michele Figuera; Rosetta Pittalà; Carmelo Privitera; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Immediate and Evolutionary Recovery of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comparison with Surgery.

Authors:  Sang Jin Ha; Sang Yong Yoo; Myeong Ki Hong; Geu Ru Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.