Literature DB >> 11512147

A study of common interferences with the forensic luminol test for blood.

T I Quickenden1, J I Creamer.   

Abstract

A wide range of domestic and industrial substances that might be mistaken for haemoglobin in the forensic luminol test for blood were examined. The substances studied were in the categories of vegetable or fruit pulps and juices; domestic and commercial oils; cleaning agents; an insecticide; and various glues, paints and varnishes. A significant number of substances in each category gave luminescence intensities that were comparable with the intensities of undiluted haemoglobin, when sprayed with the standard forensic solution containing aqueous alkaline luminol and sodium perborate. In these cases the substance could be easily mistaken for blood when the luminol test is used, but in the remaining cases the luminescence intensity was so weak that it is unlikely that a false-positive test would be obtained. In a few cases the brightly emitting substance could be distinguished from blood by a small but detectable shift of the peak emission wavelength. The results indicated that particular care should be taken to avoid interferences when a crime scene is contaminated with parsnip, turnip or horseradish, and when surfaces coated with enamel paint are involved. To a lesser extent, some care should be taken when surfaces covered with terracotta or ceramic tiles, polyurethane varnishes or jute and sisal matting are involved. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11512147     DOI: 10.1002/bio.657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Luminescence        ISSN: 1522-7235            Impact factor:   2.464


  8 in total

1.  Drying properties of bloodstains on common indoor surfaces.

Authors:  Frank Ramsthaler; Peter Schmidt; Roman Bux; Stefan Potente; Cristina Kaiser; Mattias Kettner
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Active oxygen doctors the evidence.

Authors:  Ana Castelló; Francesc Francès; Dolores Corella; Fernando Verdú
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-10-21

3.  Detectability, visualization, and DNA analysis of bloodstains after repainting the walls.

Authors:  Frank Ramsthaler; Julia Schlote; Axel Gehl; Sabine Cappel-Hoffmann; Mattias Kettner
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Luminol-based chemiluminescent signals: clinical and non-clinical application and future uses.

Authors:  Parvez Khan; Danish Idrees; Michael A Moxley; John A Corbett; Faizan Ahmad; Guido von Figura; William S Sly; Abdul Waheed; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.926

5.  Identification of female-specific blood stains using a 17β-estradiol-targeted aptamer-based sensor.

Authors:  Joo-Young Kim; Jung-Hyun Park; Man Il Kim; Hye Hyeon Lee; Hye Lim Kim; Kyu-Sik Jeong; Sang-Ok Moon; Pil-Won Kang; Ki-Won Park; Yang-Han Lee; Byung-Won Chun
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Luminol chemiluminescence: contribution to postmortem interval determination of skeletonized remains in Portuguese forensic context.

Authors:  Catarina Ermida; David Navega; Eugénia Cunha
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Luminol testing in detecting modern human skeletal remains: a test on different types of bone tissue and a caveat for PMI interpretation.

Authors:  Giorgio Caudullo; Valentina Caruso; Annalisa Cappella; Emanuela Sguazza; Debora Mazzarelli; Alberto Amadasi; Cristina Cattaneo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  An evaluation of luminol formulations and their effect on DNA profiling.

Authors:  Gnyaneshwari Patel; Andy Hopwood
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.686

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.