Literature DB >> 11511945

Differential indication for mechanical circulatory support following heart transplantation.

P A Minev1, A El-Banayosy, K Minami, H Körtke, L Kizner, R Körfer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe our experience with ventricular assist devices (VAD) in patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to pharmacological therapy and support using intraaortic balloon pump after cardiac transplantation. PATIENTS: Between July 1987 and August 1997, 848 patients underwent cardiac transplantation in our hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Fifteen patients (1.8%) needed mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiac failure due to right heart failure (six patients), primary graft failure (three patients), and acute rejection (six patients). Three pump systems were used: Biomedicus Centrifugal Pump, Abiomed BVS 500, and Thoratec VAD. The choice of system depended on the indication and quality of each device. Seven patients (47%) could be weaned from the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) system and three patients (20%) are long-term survivors.
RESULTS: All 15 patients developed at least one serious complication, such as multiorgan failure (MOF), liver failure, acute renal failure or sepsis. Twenty-five per cent had severe bleeding and 13% had neurological complication. Mortality was due mostly to MOF, MOF and sepsis or sepsis. The survivors had a CI greater than 2.2 l.min.m2, total bilirubin less than 1.0 U/1, and did not undergo resuscitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure after cardiac transplantation severe enough to require MCS is currently associated with several major complications and high mortality (80%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11511945     DOI: 10.1007/s001340101006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  7 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support: expanding knowledge and experience in a challenging patient subset.

Authors:  W L Holman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Mechanical circulatory support with the ABIOMED BVS 5000: the Toronto General Hospital experience.

Authors:  Vidyadhar Lad; Abdelsalam Elhenawy; Steve Harwood; Jane Maciver; Mitesh Vallabh Badiwala; Mark Vallelonga; Terrence M Yau; Robert J Cusimano; Diego H Delgado; Heather J Ross; Vivek Rao
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Predictors of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning after assistance for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nadia Aissaoui; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Pascal Leprince; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Philippe Léger; Alain Pavie; Benoit Diebold; Jean Chastre; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Should heart transplant recipients with early graft failure be considered for retransplantation?

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Kimberly N Hong; Rachel Easterwood; Jonathan Yang; Valluvam Jeevanandam; Yoshifumi Naka; Mark J Russo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Management of acute severe perioperative failure of cardiac allografts: a single-centre experience with a review of the literature.

Authors:  Moheb Ibrahim; Paul Hendry; Roy Masters; Fraser Rubens; B-Khanh Lam; Marc Ruel; Ross Davies; Haissam Haddad; John P Veinot; Thierry Mesana
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 6.  Perioperative pharmacotherapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Nicholas C Dang; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.271

7.  Extracorporeal rescue for early and late graft failure after cardiac transplantation: short result and long-term followup.

Authors:  Nai-Kuan Chou; Nai-Hsin Chi; Hsi-Yu Yu; Jou-Wei Lin; Chih-Hsien Wang; Shoei-Shen Wang; Yih-Sharng Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.