Literature DB >> 11510780

The effects of pressurization rate on breathing pattern, work of breathing, gas exchange and patient comfort in pressure support ventilation.

D Chiumello1, P Pelosi, M Croci, L M Bigatello, L Gattinoni.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different pressurization rates during pressure support ventilation on breathing pattern, work of breathing, gas exchange and patient comfort in patients with acute lung injury. The pressurization rate modifies the initial pressure ramp by changing the initial peak flow rate: the increase in pressurization rate is associated with a decrease in the time to reach the level of pressure support ventilation by increasing the peak flow rate. Ten intubated patients (age 64+/-17 yrs, body mass index 24+/-17 Kg x m(-2), arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction 214+/-59) were studied in random order varying the pressurization rate at 5 and 15 cmH2O of pressure support ventilation. Breathing comfort was evaluated by a visual analogue scale. Increasing the pressurization rate caused an increase of peak flow rate from 473+/-141 mL x s(-1) to 758+/-302 mL x s(-1) at pressure support ventilation 5 (p<0.05) and from 481+/-126 mL x s(-1) to 1,121+/-175 mL x s(-1) at pressure support ventilation 15 (p<0.05). At the lowest pressurization rate the tidal volume was the lowest, the respiratory rate and the work of breathing were the highest (p<0.05) compared with other pressurization rates. Excluding the lowest pressurization rate, in all the other pressurization rates tested the breathing pattern and the work of breathing did not change. The lowest and the highest pressurization rates caused the worst patient comfort (p<0.05). The gas exchange was stable throughout the study. The presented results suggest: 1) the lowest pressurization rate caused the lowest tidal volume, highest respiratory rate and highest work of breathing; 2) at the other pressurization rates no differences in breathing pattern and work of breathing were observed; and 3) the patient's comfort was worse at the lowest and highest pressurization rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510780     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.01.00083901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hypothesis: Fever control, a niche for alpha-2 agonists in the setting of septic shock and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Authors:  F Petitjeans; S Leroy; C Pichot; A Geloen; M Ghignone; L Quintin
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2018-05-22

2.  Acute effects of hyperoxemia on dyspnoea and respiratory variables during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Carlo Alberto Volta; Valentina Alvisi; Sara Bertacchini; Elisabetta Marangoni; Riccardo Ragazzi; Marco Verri; Raffaele Alvisi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators.

Authors:  Arnaud W Thille; Aissam Lyazidi; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Fabrice Galia; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Bedside waveforms interpretation as a tool to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies.

Authors:  Dimitris Georgopoulos; George Prinianakis; Eumorfia Kondili
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Clinical review: patient-ventilator interaction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Philippe Jolliet; Didier Tassaux
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Helmet ventilation and carbon dioxide rebreathing: effects of adding a leak at the helmet ports.

Authors:  Fabrizio Racca; Lorenzo Appendini; Cesare Gregoretti; Ilaria Varese; Giacomo Berta; Ferdinando Vittone; Gabriela Ferreyra; Elisa Stra; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part I.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 8.  [Ventilation strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Authors:  M Stein; M Joannidis
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation delivered by helmet vs. standard face mask.

Authors:  Davide Chiumello; Paolo Pelosi; Eleonora Carlesso; Paolo Severgnini; Michele Aspesi; Chiara Gamberoni; Massimo Antonelli; Giorgio Conti; Maurizio Chiaranda; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Imposed work of breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a bench study.

Authors:  Marc van Heerde; Huib R van Genderingen; Tom Leenhoven; Karel Roubik; Frans B Plötz; Dick G Markhorst
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.