OBJECTIVE: To study the potential for prenatal magnetic resonance imaging to predict pulmonary hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (11 left, 2 right) without associated anomalies and 74 controls. METHODS: Measurements by magnetic resonance imaging of fetal lung volume were achieved. In the control fetuses, a regression analysis was performed to associate fetal lung volume with gestational age. This yielded a formula allowing calculation of the expected fetal lung volume as a function of gestational age. In the cases with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, the observed/expected fetal lung volume ratio was compared with perinatal outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal mortality and pulmonary hypoplasia, which was defined as lung/body weight ratios less than 0.012. RESULTS: The expected fetal lung volume was derived from the following formula: Fetal lung volume (mL) = exp (1.24722 + 0.08939 x gestational age in weeks). The observed/expected fetal lung volume ratio was significantly lower in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (median: 0.31, range: 0.06-0.63), than in controls (median: 0.99, range: 0.42-1.94). This ratio was significantly less in the infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia who died (median: 0.26, range: 0.06-0.63) compared with those who survived (median: 0.46, range: 0.35-0.56). The observed: expected fetal lung volume ratio was significantly correlated with the post mortem lung: body weight ratio. CONCLUSION: In isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia, fetal lung volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging is a potential predictor of pulmonary hypoplasia and postnatal outcome. Further studies are required to establish the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging for the prenatal assessment of fetal lungs.
OBJECTIVE: To study the potential for prenatal magnetic resonance imaging to predict pulmonary hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (11 left, 2 right) without associated anomalies and 74 controls. METHODS: Measurements by magnetic resonance imaging of fetal lung volume were achieved. In the control fetuses, a regression analysis was performed to associate fetal lung volume with gestational age. This yielded a formula allowing calculation of the expected fetal lung volume as a function of gestational age. In the cases with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, the observed/expected fetal lung volume ratio was compared with perinatal outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal mortality and pulmonary hypoplasia, which was defined as lung/body weight ratios less than 0.012. RESULTS: The expected fetal lung volume was derived from the following formula: Fetal lung volume (mL) = exp (1.24722 + 0.08939 x gestational age in weeks). The observed/expected fetal lung volume ratio was significantly lower in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (median: 0.31, range: 0.06-0.63), than in controls (median: 0.99, range: 0.42-1.94). This ratio was significantly less in the infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia who died (median: 0.26, range: 0.06-0.63) compared with those who survived (median: 0.46, range: 0.35-0.56). The observed: expected fetal lung volume ratio was significantly correlated with the post mortem lung: body weight ratio. CONCLUSION: In isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia, fetal lung volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging is a potential predictor of pulmonary hypoplasia and postnatal outcome. Further studies are required to establish the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging for the prenatal assessment of fetal lungs.
Authors: Csilla Balassy; Gregor Kasprian; Peter C Brugger; Michael Weber; Bence Csapo; Christoph Mittermayer; Marcus Hörmann; Daniela Prayer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Bonfils; G Emeriaud; C Durand; S Brancato; F Nugues; P-S Jouk; I Wroblewski; T Debillon Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Csilla Balassy; Gregor Kasprian; Peter C Brugger; Michael Weber; Bence Csapo; Christian Herold; Daniela Prayer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jeffrey D Sperling; Teresa N Sparks; Victoria K Berger; Jody A Farrell; Kristen Gosnell; Roberta L Keller; Mary E Norton; Juan M Gonzalez Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Marie Vincent; Justyna A Karolak; Gail Deutsch; Tomasz Gambin; Edwina Popek; Bertrand Isidor; Przemyslaw Szafranski; Cedric Le Caignec; Paweł Stankiewicz Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Timothy C Lee; Foong Y Lim; Sundeep G Keswani; Jason S Frischer; Beth Haberman; Paul S Kingma; Mounira Habli; Ronald K Jaekle; Gina Sharp; Beth Kline-Fath; Eva I Rubio; Maria Calvo; Carolina Guimaraes; Timothy M Crombleholme Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: L van den Hout; I Sluiter; S Gischler; A De Klein; R Rottier; H Ijsselstijn; I Reiss; D Tibboel Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.827