Literature DB >> 11510632

Comparison of condylar position in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial skeletal types.

R A Girardot1.   

Abstract

Orthodontists have long been interested in the differences in the diagnosis and treatment of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent facial types. More recently, many orthodontists have become interested in treating to a seated condylar position or centric relation. It was the objective of this study to investigate the difference in condylar position between these 2 extreme facial types. Two groups of 33 subjects, each representing the extremes in facial type, were randomly selected and matched for age and sex. Mounted casts and the MPI instrumentation were used to measure and compare the amount of condylar distraction between the 2 groups in the horizontal and vertical planes. The total amount of change between the 2 groups was examined using a statistical t-test. There was a statistically significant greater distraction of the condyles in the hyperdivergent group in both the horizontal and vertical planes.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510632     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0240:COCPIH>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  9 in total

1.  Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types.

Authors:  Maryam Paknahad; Shoaleh Shahidi; Hajar Abbaszade
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Condylar Symmetry and Condyle-Fossa Relationship of the Temporomandibular Joint in Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta; Swaroopa Rani Ponnada; Kranthi Praveen Raju Gaddam; Kiran Perumalla; Imran Khan; Naqeed Abdul Mohammed
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Soo Young Kim Weffort; Solange Mongelli de Fantini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The class II/1 anomaly of hereditary etiology vs. thumb-sucking etiology.

Authors:  H Pădure; A R Negru; D Stanciu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2012-06-18

5.  Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern.

Authors:  In-Young Park; Ji-Hyun Kim; Yang-Ho Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Comparison of condylar displacement between three biotypological facial groups by using mounted models and a mandibular position indicator.

Authors:  Maria João Ponces; José Pedro Tavares; Jorge Dias Lopes; Afonso Pinhão Ferreira
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Articulated dental cast analysis of asymptomatic and symptomatic populations.

Authors:  Frank E Cordray
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 8.  Efficacy of Selective Grinding Guided by an Occlusal Splint in Management of Myofascial Pain: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Felipe J Fernández-González; Jorge Cabero-López; Aritza Brizuela; Ivan Suazo; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Teresa Cobo; Oier Montalban; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; David Chávarri-Prado; Iker Bellanco de la Pinta; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-06-30

9.  The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.

Authors:  Ilona Radej; Izabela Szarmach
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.