Literature DB >> 11510583

Training background as a factor in the conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J Ayerdi1, J Wiseman, S K Gupta, S C Simon.   

Abstract

The present study reports findings concerning the impact of the learning environment on the conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to open cholecystectomy (OC). At Metro-West Medical Center (Framingham, MA) seven surgeons performed 866 LCs between 1990 and 1995. Group I consisted of three surgeons who learned the procedure as part of their General Surgery Residency training, whereas the remaining four surgeons representing Group II learned the procedure through private courses. We emphasize the importance of the surgeons' training background on the conversion rates, operative times, and length of hospitalization for patients undergoing LC. The conversion rates, operative times, and complication rates were analyzed with and without a 2-year period of adjustment to compensate for the learning curve of early procedures. Operative times and conversion rates from LC to OC were lower for cases done by surgeons from Group I, even when the learning curve was corrected. The complication rates were higher for surgeons in Group II, but this did not reach statistical significance. As surgeons from Group II gained more experience their operation times and conversion rates decreased. However, there still was a statistically significant difference in favor of surgeons who learned the procedure as part of a structured curriculum. These data suggest a long-lasting influence of the learning environment on the conversion rates and operative times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

1.  Age, is it an obstacle for older surgeons to learn laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Zhang Xing-mao; Hou Hui-rong; Wang Zi-nian; Wang Hong-ying; Hu Jun-jie; Wang Zheng; Liang Jian-wei; Bi Jian-jun; Zhou Hai-tao; Zhou Zhi-xiang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Impact on laboratory training in subsequent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Tetsuji Fujita; Takeyuki Misawa; Taro Sakamoto; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Trainees: Predictors and Results in an Academic Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Hussein M Atta; Ashraf A Mohamed; Alaa M Sewefy; Abdel-Fatah S Abdel-Fatah; Mohammed M Mohammed; Ahmed M Atiya
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy influences the rate of conversion in patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Case series.

Authors:  W E Abdelrahim; Kamal E Elsiddig; A A Wahab; M Saad; H Saeed; E A G Khalil
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-05-25

5.  Patient experience with gallstone disease in a national health service district hospital.

Authors:  Santosh Balakrishnan; Tushar Samdani; Tarun Singhal; Abdulzahra Hussain; Starlene Grandy-Smith; Jacqueline Nicholls; Shamsi El-Hasani
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.