Literature DB >> 23423785

Age, is it an obstacle for older surgeons to learn laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer?

Zhang Xing-mao1, Hou Hui-rong, Wang Zi-nian, Wang Hong-ying, Hu Jun-jie, Wang Zheng, Liang Jian-wei, Bi Jian-jun, Zhou Hai-tao, Zhou Zhi-xiang.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic colorectal resection has been extensively accepted for treatment of colorectal cancer. There are several reports about surgeon's age as a factor to have influence on learning laparoscopic approach, and there is no consensus on this point. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection in period of learning curve completed by surgeons with different age in order to make clear whether older surgeons may learn laparoscopic approach with more difficulty than younger. From July 2010 to August 2012, the first twenty patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection completed by each surgeon were selected for analysis. A total of 240 patients treated by 5 older surgeons with median age of 51 years (range 47-54 years) and 7 younger surgeons with median age of 37 years (range 34-43 years) were divided into group 1 (n = 100) and group 2 (n = 140). The short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery of the two groups were compared. Two groups were matched in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), etc. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 18 (range 7-63) in group 1 and 16 (range 3-66) in group 2 (P = 0.003); The median operative time in group 1 was 185 min (range 105-480 min) compared to 235 min (range 120-470 min) in group 2 (P < 0.001), and blood loss were 150 ml (range 50-400 ml) and 200 ml (range 50-800 ml), respectively (P < 0.001); Conversion rate in group 2 was lower than in group 1 (12.0 vs 18.6 %, P = 0.196). The mean time to passing of first flatus was 3 day (range 2-5 day) in group 1 and 4 day (range 2-6 day) in group 2 (P = 0.001). Older surgeons can master the laparoscopic skill more easily and quickly. Age is not an obstacle for older surgeons to learn laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23423785     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0495-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in progress.

Authors:  R Sjödahl; P O Nyström
Journal:  Eur J Surg Suppl       Date:  1998

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Gil-O Ryu; Byung-Jo Choi; Jeong-Goo Kim; Kwan-Ju Lee; Sang Chul Lee; Seong-Taek Oh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  Emad H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Preliminary results of laparoscopic colorectal resections: does surgeon's age influences outcomes?

Authors:  L Boni; M Di Giuseppe; C Bertoglio; A Benevento; G Dionigi; F Rovera; R Dionigi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Ka Lau Leung; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Anthony Y B Teoh; Wing Wa Leung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Total mesorectal excision (TME) with laparoscopic approach: 226 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Carlo Staudacher; Saverio Di Palo; Andrea Tamburini; Andrea Vignali; Elena Orsenigo
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.279

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Jun Wang; Huanrong Lan; Ruili Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.