Literature DB >> 1150943

Within-subjects positive and negative contrast effects in rats.

C F Flaherty, J Largen.   

Abstract

Rats were given alternating 1-min. access periods to 2 tubes containing either 32% or 4% sucrose solutions for daily 6-min. test sessions. Lick rate for 32% was higher under comparison (32 vs. 4) than noncomparison (32 vs. 32) conditions; and lick rate for 4% was lower under comparison conditions (4 vs. 32) than under noncomparison conditions (4 vs. 4). All sucrose conditions were varied within subjects and both positive and negative contrast were obtained with a small n. In addition to lick rate, intake and latency measures also revealed contrast effects. Deprivation conditions altered latency but not lick rate measures of contrast. Reducing the test session to 3 min. (alternating 30-sec. access periods) did not greatly affect contrast. Additional experiments provided evidence for distinct within-days and between-days contrast effects, as well as a between-groups contrast effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1150943     DOI: 10.1037/h0076416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940


  9 in total

1.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects.

Authors:  E S Webber; N E Chambers; J A Kostek; D E Mankin; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala.

Authors:  Vincent D Campese; Ian T Kim; Mian Hou; Saurav Gupta; Cassandra Draus; Botagoz Kurpas; Kelsey Burke; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of alcohol and saccharin deprivations on concurrent ethanol and saccharin operant self-administration by alcohol-preferring (P) rats.

Authors:  Jamie E Toalston; Scott M Oster; Kelly A Kuc; Tylene J Pommer; James M Murphy; Lawrence Lumeng; Richard L Bell; William J McBride; Zachary A Rodd
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats.

Authors:  Christopher P King; Abraham A Palmer; Leah C Solberg Woods; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Behavioral processes mediating phencyclidine-induced decreases in voluntary sucrose consumption.

Authors:  John-Paul Baird; Sarah Turgeon; Aaron Wallman; Virginia Hulick
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 7.  Animal models and treatments for addiction and depression co-morbidity.

Authors:  Neil E Paterson; Athina Markou
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.911

8.  An easy-to-hard effect after nonreinforced preexposure in a sweetness discrimination.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Sanjuán; James Byron Nelson; Gumersinda Alonso
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.926

9.  Predictive and motivational factors influencing anticipatory contrast: A comparison of contextual and gustatory predictors in food restricted and free-fed rats.

Authors:  Jessica Hayes; Celia Garau; Giulia Chiacchierini; Gonzalo P Urcelay; James E McCutcheon; John Apergis-Schoute
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-09-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.