Literature DB >> 11508974

On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants.

J D Harnsberger1.   

Abstract

To examine the relationship between the identification and discrimination of non-native sounds, nasal consonants varying in place of articulation from Malayalam, Marathi, and Oriya were presented in two experiments to seven listener groups varying in their native nasal consonant inventory: Malayalam, Marathi, Punjabi, Tamil, Oriya, Bengali, and American English. The experiments consisted of a categorial AXB discrimination test and a forced-choice identification test with category goodness ratings. The identification test results were used to classify the non-native contrasts as one of five "assimilation types" of the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM) that are predicted to vary in their relative discriminability: two-category (TC), uncategorizable-categorizable (UC), both uncategorizable (UU), category-goodness (CG), and single-category (SC). The results showed that the mean percent correct discrimination scores of the assimilation types, but not the range of scores, were accurately predicted. Furthermore, differences in category goodness ratings in the CG and SC assimilations that were predicted to correlate with discrimination showed a weak, but significant correlation (r= 0.3 1, p<0.05). The implications of the results for models of cross-language speech perception were discussed, and an alternative model of cross-language speech perception was outlined, in which the discriminability of non-native contrasts is a function of the similarity of non-native sounds to each other in a multidimensional, phonologized perceptual space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508974     DOI: 10.1121/1.1371758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Perceptual sensitivity to first harmonic amplitude in the voice source.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French.

Authors:  Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Listening with an accent: speech perception in a second language by late bilinguals.

Authors:  Mark Leikin; Raphiq Ibrahim; Zohar Eviatar; Shimon Sapir
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-03-04

5.  On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults' French vowel learning.

Authors:  Erika S Levy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Catherine T Best; Alice Faber; Andrea G Levitt
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 7.  Speech perception as categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: the roles of language experience and visual information.

Authors:  Amanda Reid; Denis Burnham; Benjawan Kasisopa; Ronan Reilly; Virginie Attina; Nan Xu Rattanasone; Catherine T Best
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.