Literature DB >> 11508402

Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living.

J Jutai1, P Rigby, S Ryan, S Stickel.   

Abstract

Electronic aids to daily living (EADLs) allow persons who have a degenerative neuromuscular condition such as Duchenne's muscular dystrophy to operate a wide variety of household and workplace appliances without assistance (independent of family members or other caregivers). There is very little published research to describe how well EADLs are perceived by users to enhance their sense of personal autonomy, functional independence, and psychological well being. Psychosocial impact is a significant determinant of how users perceive the benefit of assistive devices to their quality of life. This study compared the perceived psychosocial impact of EADLs on a group of device users with the anticipated impact of EADLs reported by a group who were eligible for, but had not yet received, these devices. The perceptions of the user group were measured at two points in time, approximately 6 to 9 months apart, to examine the stability of psychosocial impact. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale was the instrument used to assess perceived impact. EADLs were found to produce similar degrees of positive impact on users and positive perceptions of anticipated impact on those without devices. The psychosocial impact on users was stable over time. The results indicate that the perceived benefits of EADLs to the autonomy, functional independence, and psychological well being of both users and nonusers are positive and strikingly similar. The study is an important first step in attempting to quantify psychosocial outcomes for EADLs in a way that might facilitate economic analysis of these devices in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11508402     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices.

Authors:  Claudine Auger; Louise Demers; Isabelle Gélinas; François Routhier; W Ben Mortenson; William C Miller
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Behavioral intention to use a virtual instrumental activities of daily living system among people with stroke.

Authors:  Allison Ellington; Richard Adams; Marga White; Paul Diamond
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2015 May-Jun

4.  The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version.

Authors:  Louise Demers; Michèle Monette; Micheline Descent; Jeffrey Jutai; Christina Wolfson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Impact of three genetic musculoskeletal diseases: a comparative synthesis of achondroplasia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Maman Joyce Dogba; Frank Rauch; Erin Douglas; Christophe Bedos
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Technology-assisted toilets: Improving independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  David Yachnin; Georges Gharib; Jeffrey Jutai; Hillel Finestone
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-08-29

7.  Assistive technology based on client-centered for occupational performance in neuromuscular conditions.

Authors:  Thais Pousada García; Javier Pereira Loureiro; Betania Groba González; Laura Nieto-Rivero
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  How Loan Bank of Assistive Technology Impacts on Life of Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Neuromuscular Diseases: A Collaborative Initiative.

Authors:  Thais Pousada; Jessica Garabal-Barbeira; Cristina Martínez; Betania Groba; Laura Nieto-Riveiro; Javier Pereira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The Anticipated Positive Psychosocial Impact of Present Web-Based E-Health Services and Future Mobile Health Applications: An Investigation among Older Swedes.

Authors:  S Wiklund Axelsson; L Nyberg; A Näslund; A Melander Wikman
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2013-12-03

10.  Does the addition of virtual reality training to a standard program of inpatient rehabilitation improve sitting balance ability and function after stroke? Protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Sheehy; A Taillon-Hobson; H Sveistrup; M Bilodeau; D Fergusson; D Levac; H Finestone
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.