Literature DB >> 11508103

Functional processes when wearing the SII appliance during the day.

F G Sander1.   

Abstract

In 20 subjects the neuromuscular activity during the day was divided into six different activities and recorded. In the case of typical application of the SII appliance for 4 hours in the afternoon and the free organization of this time by the patient himself, most of the time fell into the area "intellectual activity" followed by the area "manual activity". Since the term "functional orthodontics" naturally describes the function, this should be realized most impressively when wearing such an appliance during the day. During the day there are mouth opening and closing movements of varying frequency with quite different amplitudes. Conversation as well as reading a text aloud can be considered favorable in terms of neuromuscular adaptation. Obviously, the relatively short habituation period soon results in the patient not needing the bars as guiding bars any more (this is in contrast to investigations during nocturnal sleep). In other words, the patient needs them only for a brief time to influence the muscles in such a way that the neuromuscular masticatory pattern is virtually independent of the bars. Only during intellectual and practical activity does the patient rest on the inclined plane with the help of the bars and execute small movements. Consequently, wearing the SII appliance during the day can be regarded as extremely important to the success of treatment. Important neuromuscular influences occur while doing homework as well as during intellectual activity. Wearing the appliance during the day corresponds to neuromuscular programming, so that the term "functional orthodontic appliance" is completely correct. Since there are only about 600 biting actions during the night, a functional orthodontic appliance should definitely be worn for a certain time during the day too, in order not to jeopardize the neuromuscular adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508103     DOI: 10.1007/pl00001934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  5 in total

1.  Effects of two different functional appliances on root development of posterior teeth: activator vs. bite-jumping appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Susanna Savvaidis; Norbert Gülden; Björn Ludwig; Michael Knösel; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effects of wear time differences of removable functional appliances in class II patients: prospective MRI study of TMJ and masticatory muscle changes.

Authors:  Emre Cesur; Orhan Özdiler; Ayşegül Köklü; Kaan Orhan; Umut Seki
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Evaluation of temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscle, and brain cortex activity in patients treated by removable functional appliances: a prospective fMRI study.

Authors:  Orhan Ozdiler; Kaan Orhan; Emre Cesur; Ayşegül Köklü; Oktay Algın
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Mechanical Stress Affects Circadian Rhythm in Skeletal Muscle (C2C12 Myoblasts) by Reducing Per/Cry Gene Expression and Increasing Bmal1 Gene Expression.

Authors:  Mengjia Wang; Da Yu; Lichun Zheng; Bing Hong; Houxuan Li; Xiaobei Hu; Kun Zhang; Yongbin Mou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Occlus-o-Guide® versus Andresen activator appliance: neuromuscular evaluation.

Authors:  Giampietro Farronato; Lucia Giannini; Guido Galbiati; Elena Grillo; Cinzia Maspero
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.