Literature DB >> 11505405

Randomized phase II study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine compared with single-agent carboplatin in patients with poor prognosis small cell lung carcinoma.

S C White1, P Lorigan, M R Middleton, H Anderson, J Valle, Y Summers, P A Burt, A Arance, R Stout, N Thatcher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information on the effect of chemotherapy in a group of patients with poor prognosis, poor performance status small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is scarce. A randomized study comparing single-agent carboplatin with combination chemotherapy in this largely unreported population of SCLC patients was undertaken.
METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients were allocated to four cycles of either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) or single-agent carboplatin. Patients had either a Karnofsky performance score < or = 50 and/or a prognostic score indicative of a 1-year survival rate < or = 15%.
RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia and intravenous antibiotic use were significantly more common with the CAV regimen (P < 0.005). Conversely, Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was more common (P < 0.0009) and platelet transfusion was more frequent (P < 0.05) with carboplatin therapy. Nonhematologic toxicity was similar in both treatment arms, except for alopecia with CAV therapy (P < 0.0007). Symptom relief occurred in 48% and 41% of patients in the CAV and carboplatin treatment arms, respectively. Dyspnea was improved in 66% and 41% of patients and cough was improved in 21% and 7% of patients in the CAV and carboplatin treatment arms, respectively. CAV therapy produced a higher response rate than carboplatin (38% vs. 25%), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). The median overall survival for patients in the CAV and carboplatin treatment arms was 17 weeks and 15.9 weeks, respectively, with 1-year survival rates of 12% and 6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent carboplatin is a feasible treatment in patients with poor prognosis SCLC and produces response rates, relief of tumor-related symptoms, and survival similar to what is seen in patients who receive CAV chemotherapy. The lower risk of life-threatening sepsis and less need for hospitalization or intravenous antibiotic courses is advantageous in this susceptible patient population. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11505405     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<601::aid-cncr1360>3.0.co;2-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer 7: management of lung cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  R Booton; M Jones; N Thatcher
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  A phase I trial and in vitro studies combining ABT-751 with carboplatin in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Tian Ma; Alexander D Fuld; James R Rigas; Anne E Hagey; Gary B Gordon; Ethan Dmitrovsky; Konstantin H Dragnev
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.544

3.  p-Glycoprotein ABCB5 and YB-1 expression plays a role in increased heterogeneity of breast cancer cells: correlations with cell fusion and doxorubicin resistance.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Yang; Seon-Ah Ha; Yun-Sik Yang; Jin Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Modern management of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Ferraldeschi; Sofia Baka; Babita Jyoti; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Nick Thatcher; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Saion Chatterjee; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun M Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-02

Review 6.  Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Syed Mustafa Karim; Jamal Zekri
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2012-04-02

Review 7.  Immune checkpoint blockade in small cell lung cancer: is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Luca Paglialunga; Zena Salih; Biagio Ricciuti; Raffaele Califano
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-08-05

8.  Outcomes of cancer therapy administered to treatment-naïve lung cancer patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Yen-Fu Chen; Jou-Wei Lin; Chao-Chi Ho; Ching-Yao Yang; Chia-Hao Chang; Tao-Min Huang; Chung-Yu Chen; Kuan-Yu Chen; Jin-Yuan Shih; Chong-Jen Yu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Risk Factors for Infections, Antibiotic Therapy, and Its Impact on Cancer Therapy Outcomes for Patients with Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Ondřej Kubeček; Pavla Paterová; Martina Novosadová
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11

10.  Identical chemotherapy schedules given on and off trial protocol in small cell lung cancer: response and survival results.

Authors:  J A Burgers; A Arance; L Ashcroft; J Hodgetts; L Lomax; N Thatcher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.