Literature DB >> 11504302

Risk in numbers--difficulties in the transformation of genetic knowledge from research to people--the case of hereditary cancer.

L Sachs1, A Taube, C Tishelman.   

Abstract

Difficulties in communicating diagnostic information are exacerbated when the 'diagnosis' is a 'genetic risk' for cancer. The risk estimation demanded in this situation differs from other types of probability estimations. Observations of participants in 45 consultation sessions between physicians and potential patients were conducted at a clinic for hereditary cancer to explore the communication of genetic information. Thirty-three sessions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed, along with notes from the other sessions. A dominant theme was found to be numerical discussion of risk. Further analysis resulted in the description of problems for practitioners in the process of translating scientific knowledge into clinical management. Problems in providing information include unclear aims of the consultation sessions, mixing various types of background information and probabilities, recognizing how low the predictive values are, and difficulties in communicating the relationship between probability and conclusions. Problems in communicating information about the genetic risk for cancer are of at least two types: dilemmas arising from uncertainties implicit in the nature of the information itself and difficulties in communicating information in a manner that those concerned can interpret. These issues need clarification, so that information with far-reaching consequences can be made as clear and comprehensible as possible for those involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11504302     DOI: 10.1080/028418601750288154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Sources of uncertainty about daughters' breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations.

Authors:  Carma L Bylund; Carla L Fisher; Dale Brashers; Shawna Edgerson; Emily A Glogowski; Sherry R Boyar; Yelena Kemel; Sara Spencer; David Kissane
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  What women with breast cancer discuss with clinicians about risk for their adolescent daughters.

Authors:  Erin Maloney; Shawna Edgerson; Mark Robson; Ken Offit; Richard Brown; Carma Bylund; David W Kissane
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

3.  "I Don't Want to Be an Ostrich": Managing Mothers' Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Carla L Fisher; Thomas Roccotagliata; Camella J Rising; David W Kissane; Emily A Glogowski; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lori d'Agincourt-Canning
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The potential of a placebo/nocebo effect in pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  S B Haga; L R Warner; J O'Daniel
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  "I Did Not Believe You Could Get Better"-Reversal of Diabetes Risk Through Dietary Changes in Older Persons with Prediabetes in Region Stockholm.

Authors:  Linda Timm; Meena Daivadanam; Anton Lager; Birger Forsberg; Claes-Göran Östenson; Helle Mölsted Alvesson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Communicating genetic information: a difficult challenge for future pediatricians.

Authors:  Eduardo Rosas-Blum; Pratibha Shirsat; Marie Leiner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.