Literature DB >> 11504287

Cusum analysis of trends in operative selection and conversion rates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A Bartlett1, B Parry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) requires a high degree of technical ability, spatial resolution and dexterity. Assessing trainees and competent operators is an important aspect of quality assurance in patient care. Most institutions quote mean conversion rate as a method of comparing operators' performance. The purpose of the present study was to use the technique of cumulative sum (cusum) analysis to determine whether a learning curve phenomenon exists in operators performing LC.
METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively by reviewing the operative records of all patients undergoing elective and acute cholecystectomy for a 30-month period coinciding with the commencement of LC at North Shore Hospital. Patients' age and gender, date and type of operative procedure, duration of operation, and name of operator were recorded. Mean and cusum-transformed data were derived for all operations as well as for four individual operators' performances.
RESULTS: Over the study period a total of 614 cholecystectomies was performed, with 85% attempted laparoscopically. A total of 9.8% required conversion to the open technique. Time trend analysis with the cusum technique for all surgeons revealed an inverse relationship between selection rate and conversion rate. Analysis of four individual surgeons revealed three different time trend profiles.
CONCLUSION: There was a direct inverse relationship between conversion rate and selection rate, in that careful selection is associated with a low conversion rate. Comparison of individual surgeons' performance showed wide variation, with only one surgeon exhibiting the phenomenon of a learning curve. Contrary to other reports, we found that performance on LC was not always related to operative experience. This highlights the need for a more objective method to analyse operator competence than operator experience alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11504287     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  11 in total

1.  How long do we need teaching in the operating room? The true costs of achieving surgical routine.

Authors:  Thomas Koperna
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: a review of the CUSUM.

Authors:  David J Biau; Mathieu Resche-Rigon; Gaëlle Godiris-Petit; Rémy S Nizard; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-06

3.  Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.

Authors:  B Lu; A M Smallwood; T A Sellers; J S Drukteinis; J J Heine; E E E Fowler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator VBLaST-SS©.

Authors:  Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Di Qi; Karthikeyan Panneerselvam; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Andinet Enquobahrie; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Statistical approach to quality assessment in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Harald Schrem; Sophia Volz; Hans-Friedrich Koch; Jill Gwiasda; Priscila Kürsch; Alon Goldis; Daniel Pöhnert; Markus Winny; Jürgen Klempnauer; Alexander Kaltenborn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Woojin Ahn; Clairice Cooper; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The effect of surgical strategy in difficult cholecystectomy cases on postoperative complications outcome: a value-based healthcare comparative study.

Authors:  K Cremer; F W H Kloppenberg; J W Vanhommerig; L M Dijksman; N Bode; S C Donkervoort
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  CUSUM analysis of J-pouch surgery reflects no learning curve after board certification.

Authors:  Patrick H D Colquhoun
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.

Authors:  Ali M Linsk; Kimberley R Monden; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

Authors:  Likun Zhang; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Woojin Ahn; Cristol Grosdemouge; Jesse M Rideout; Scott K Epstein; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.