Literature DB >> 11504108

Long-term outcome of 104 patients after lumbar sequestrectomy according to Williams.

M Wenger1, L Mariani, A Kalbarczyk, U Gröger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors report the late outcome of 104 consecutive patients after Williams' sequestrectomy for virgin lumbar disc herniation.
METHODS: The clinical records and the mailed questionnaires of 38 women and 66 men operated consecutively between March 1991 and November 1993 were analyzed retrospectively. In these 104 patients, 105 Williams' sequestrectomies were performed.
RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 50.5 years (range, 23.2-86.7 yr), and follow-up ranged from 4.1 to 6.9 years (mean, 5.3 yr). Success rates, including excellent, good, and fair results, were 92.5%, 94.7%, and 93.3% for lumbalgia, radicular pain, and neurological dysfunction, respectively. Only a few patients did not improve or presented with worsened symptoms. Three of four patients with cauda equina syndrome recovered immediately after the intervention. There were eight (7.7%) minor postoperative complications, which were treated conservatively. Three women and three men (5.8%) underwent a revision procedure for a recurrent lumbar disc herniation at the same level after 0.4 to 3.1 years (mean, 1.8 yr). Two (1.9%) of these patients underwent further operations because of reherniation, and they required internal instrumentation eventually because of failed back surgery syndrome.
CONCLUSION: Williams' conservative approach with sequestrectomy alone is a safe operative modality. It should be used whenever possible. As demonstrated in our series with a long follow-up time, the results are as favorable as or better than results after standard microsurgical lumbar discectomy with curettement of the interspace. Whether the incidence of failed back surgery syndrome can be reduced by this approach remains to be proved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11504108     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200108000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  22 in total

1.  Lateral transmuscular or combined interlaminar/paraisthmic approach to lateral lumbar disc herniation? A comparative clinical series of 48 patients.

Authors:  Y M Ryang; I Rohde; A Ince; M F Oertel; J M Gilsbach; V Rohde
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Preliminary Report of Combined Microscopic Fragmentectomy and Nucleoplasty for Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Jae Ho Kim; Seok Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-04-30

3.  Intraoperative findings, complications, and short-term results after lumbar microdiscectomy with or without implantation of annular closure device.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Volkmar Heidecke; Richard Assaker; Javier Fandino; Martin Barth
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 4.  Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bahram Fakouri; Nitin R Shetty; Thomas C H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparative Study of the Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using the Tubular Retractor System Based on the VAS, ODI, and SF-36.

Authors:  Sang Mok Yoon; Soon-Seob Ahn; Ki Hong Kim; Young Don Kim; Jae Hoon Cho; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

8.  SPORT lumbar intervertebral disk herniation and back pain: does treatment, location, or morphology matter?

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Emily A Blood; John W Frymoyer; Harry Herkowitz; William A Abdu; Randy Woodward; Michael Longley; Sanford E Emery; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Sequestrectomy versus microdiscectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teng Huang; Zhi Tian; Mengya Li; Wang Zheng; Long Zhang; Jia Chen; Jinshuai Zhai; Xicheng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

10.  An injectable nucleus replacement as an adjunct to microdiscectomy: 2 year follow-up in a pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Ulrich Berlemann; Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.