Literature DB >> 11503458

[Development of perforator vein surgery from the Linton and Cockett procedure to endoscopic dissection].

W Lang1.   

Abstract

Interruption of incompetent perforator veins (PV) is regarded as one of the principles of therapy in cases of severe stages of chronic venous insufficiency. This paper is to demonstrate the development of PV surgery from the original procedure (termed the radical Linton's operation after its originator) to minimal invasive approaches as the subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS). Subfascial or epifascial interruption is frequently complicated by poor postoperative wound healing (sometimes more than 50%) even in cases with smaller incisions as the former Linton's procedure. PV interruption by hooks and special knives has been in wide use, however, the procedure is not as precise as a direct subfascial approach. The blind subfascial perforator interruption and fasciotomy by Hach has been advocated in severe forms of chronic venous insufficiency. It was Hauer at the beginning of the eighties who introduced a video-controlled surgical approach using a scope with fiberoptic lighting and video camera. At this time, a variety of instruments and modified techniques exists, but the effect of SEPS on venous hemodynamics and clinical outcome is not totally proven due to an additional reflux or obstruction in the deep or saphenous veins and concurrent epifascial surgery. A lower rate of complications of the endoscopic procedures is described, however, there is still a rate of about 5% hematoma and about 7% delayed wound healing. SEPS is an important adjunct in severe cases of PV insufficiency with chronic venous ulcers and lipodermatosclerosis. SEPS will fail in circular crural ulceration where the lesion should be totally excised and covered with skin transplantation. Up to now there is no study to demonstrate the efficacy of SEPS in patients with primary saphenous vein incompetence without deep reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11503458     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  3 in total

1.  Factors that influence perforator thrombosis and predict healing with perforator sclerotherapy for venous ulceration without axial reflux.

Authors:  Misaki M Kiguchi; Eric S Hager; Daniel G Winger; Stanley A Hirsch; Rabih A Chaer; Ellen D Dillavou
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Zhiliang Caleb Lin; Paula M Loveland; Renea V Johnston; Michael Bruce; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-03

3.  [Primary varicosis. Differentiated surgical therapy on an outpatient or short-term hospitalisation basis].

Authors:  M Jugenheimer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.