Literature DB >> 11502974

No evidence of accelerated loss of kidney function in living kidney donors: results from a cross-sectional follow-up.

I Fehrman-Ekholm1, F Dunér, B Brink, G Tydén, C G Elinder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of kidneys available for kidney transplantation, and living donors are increasingly used. It is important to examine the possible long-term adverse affect on the renal function and blood pressure of the donors.
METHODS: We have made a comprehensive follow-up of all living kidney donors at our center from 1964 to 1995. Of 402 donors still alive, we were able to get information about serum creatinine, urinary proteins, and blood cells in urine using reagent strips, and blood pressure from 87%. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using a formula and was measured with Iohexol clearance in 43 of the donors. Individual data on GFR and the prevalence of hypertension were compared with the age- and gender-expected values.
RESULTS: The mean age of the examined donors was 61 years (SD:13) at follow-up, and the time since donation was 12 years (SD:8). The average estimated GFR was 72% (SD:18) of the age-predicted value. The ratio of the estimated to the predicted GFR showed no correlation to the time since donation, indicating that there is no accelerated loss of renal function after donation. GFR below 30 ml/min was found in five donors. No donor died in uremia or had dialysis treatment before death. However, three donors developed renal disease, and one was in dialysis treatment. In two of these cases, hereditary factors were possibly involved. Hypertension was present in 38% of the donors but the age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among donors was not higher than in the general population. Significant proteinuria (> or =1.0 g/L) was found in 3% and slight proteinuria (<1.0 g/L) in 9% of the donors. Proteinuria was associated with hypertension and a lower GFR.
CONCLUSIONS: On average, the remaining renal function of kidney donors did not deteriorate more rapidly than what may be expected from ageing. However one-third of the female and half of the male donors developed hypertension and, approximately, 10% displayed proteinuria. Nevertheless, our study supports the continued use of living kidney donors if strict criteria are used for acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11502974     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200108150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  46 in total

1.  Very low but stable glomerular filtration rate after living kidney donation: is the concept of "chronic kidney disease" applicable to kidney donors?

Authors:  Ryo Kido; Yugo Shibagaki; Kazuhiro Iwadoh; Ichiro Nakajima; Shohei Fuchinoue; Toshiro Fujita; Satoshi Teraoka
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  A critical evaluation of chronic kidney disease--should isolated reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate be considered a 'disease'?

Authors:  Emilio D Poggio; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  Long-term renal function, complications and life expectancy in living kidney donors.

Authors:  Masahiko Okamoto
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2012-02-24

5.  Long-term graft outcome after renal arterial reconstruction during living related kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Tolga Atilla Sagban; Barbara Baur; Lars Christian Rump; Hubert Schelzig; Klaus Grabitz; Kai Michael Balzer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Reduced nephron number in adult sheep, hypertensive as a result of prenatal glucocorticoid treatment.

Authors:  E M Wintour; K M Moritz; K Johnson; S Ricardo; C S Samuel; M Dodic
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Oncological and renal medical importance of kidney-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Paul Russo
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with glomerular filtration rates in living kidney donors.

Authors:  Emilio D Poggio; Andrew D Rule; Roberto Tanchanco; Susana Arrigain; Robert S Butler; Titte Srinivas; Brian R Stephany; Kathryn H Meyer; Saul Nurko; Richard A Fatica; Daniel A Shoskes; Venkatesh Krishnamurthi; David A Goldfarb; Inderbir Gill; Martin J Schreiber
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Marginal kidney donor.

Authors:  Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Siva Prasad Gourabathini
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

10.  Role of open nephron sparing surgery in the era of minimal invasive surgery.

Authors:  Gaurav Gupta; Sameer Grover; Santosh Kumar; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.