Literature DB >> 11502137

Ongoing relationships with a personal focus: mothers' perceptions of birth centre versus hospital care.

K L Coyle1, Y Hauck, P Percival, L J Kristjanson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to describe women's perceptions of care in Western Australian birth centres following a previous hospital birth. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: an exploratory study was undertaken to examine the care experiences of women from three Western Australian birth centres. Data were obtained from 17 women whose interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The research focused upon women's perceptions of their recent birth centre care as compared to previous hospital care during childbirth.
FINDINGS: four key themes emerged from the analysis: 'beliefs about pregnancy and birth', 'nature of the care relationship', 'care interactions' and 'care structures'. The themes of 'care interactions' and 'care structures' will be presented in this paper. Care interactions refer to women's opportunities to develop rapport with their carers. Care structures involved the organisational framework in which care was delivered. The first two themes of 'beliefs about pregnancy and birth' and the 'nature of the care relationship' were discussed in a previous paper. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: differences in opportunities for care interactions and care structures were revealed between birth centre and hospital settings. Ongoing, cumulative contacts with midwives in the birth-centre setting were strongly supported by women as encouraging the development of rapport and perception of 'being known' as an individual. Additionally, care structures tailored to women were advocated over the systematised, fragmented care found in hospital settings. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11502137     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2001.0258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  5 in total

1.  Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Anna Margrethe Møller; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Lisbeth B Knudsen; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meghan A Bohren; Joshua P Vogel; Erin C Hunter; Olha Lutsiv; Suprita K Makh; João Paulo Souza; Carolina Aguiar; Fernando Saraiva Coneglian; Alex Luíz Araújo Diniz; Özge Tunçalp; Dena Javadi; Olufemi T Oladapo; Rajat Khosla; Michelle J Hindin; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  The development of midwifery unit standards for Europe.

Authors:  Juliet Rayment; Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho; Mary Newburn; Ellen Thaels; Laura Batinelli; Christine Mcourt
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Women's experience of transfer from midwifery unit to hospital obstetric unit during labour: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Louise Locock; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  E Shakibazadeh; M Namadian; M A Bohren; J P Vogel; A Rashidian; V Nogueira Pileggi; S Madeira; S Leathersich; Ӧ Tunçalp; O T Oladapo; J P Souza; A M Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.531

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.