Literature DB >> 11501436

Integration of genotoxic and population genetic endpoints in biomonitoring and risk assessment.

C W Theodorakis1.   

Abstract

Genetic ecotoxicology is a multifaceted discipline that examines the effects of xenobiotic compounds on the structure and function of DNA. This paper discusses the role of genetic ecotoxicology in environmental biomonitoring and risk assessment. Genetic ecotoxicology may include somatic effects (e.g., DNA damage) or population genetic effects (changes in genetic diversity or gene frequencies). Traditionally, genetic ecotoxicology studies have focused on either one of these sub-disciplines, but integration of these two approaches would be advantageous for three reasons. First, at the population level, concordant responses between changes in population genetic structure and elevated levels of DNA damage may provide evidence that the population genetic changes are influenced by exposure to genotoxic chemicals. Second, if the frequencies of alleles or other genetic markers differ between genotoxicant-contaminated and reference populations, associations between relative amount of DNA damage and genotype may provide evidence that these changes are due to genotoxicant-induced selection. Third, genetic analysis of gene flow may provide insight into patterns of dispersal that could obscure differences between contaminated and reference populations. In order to demonstrate the application of these ideas, three lines of research are summarized herein. The first is a series of studies that focus on radionuclide-contaminated populations of mosquitofish (Gambusia). This research identified RAPD markers that may be indicative of genetic adaptation to radionuclide stress. Relative amounts of DNA damage among genotypes presented evidence that these markers may be indicators of relative radioresistance. The second study examined DNA damage and population genetic structure in radionuclide-contaminated kangaroo rat (Dipodomys) populations. It was found that between-population differences in genetic diversity paralleled those for DNA damage and relative levels of contamination. Also, population genetic analysis indicated that there was dispersal between contaminated and reference populations, and that between-population differences in the amount of DNA damage could not be detected until this dispersal was taken into account. In the third study, populations of redbreast sunfish (Lepomis auritris) from streams contaminated with complex mixtures of industrial chemicals were examined. It was found that the genetic distances between populations within the contaminated stream corresponded with the relative magnitude of molecular and community-level effects. It was concluded that genetic ecotoxicology could make significant contributions to the fields of environmental biomonitoring and ecological risk assessment, and that integration of genotoxicology and population genetic studies would be a definite advantage toward this end.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11501436     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016677629442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  13 in total

Review 1.  DNA organization affects cellular radiosensitivity and detection of initial DNA strand breaks.

Authors:  P L Olive
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 2.  DNA, mutations and aging.

Authors:  T B Kirkwood
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Drosophila wing-spot test: improved detectability of genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  A Frölich; F E Würgler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Use of DNA fingerprinting to detect genotoxic effects.

Authors:  D Savva
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Aspects of fitness of a mosquitofish Gambusia affinis population exposed to chronic low-level environmental radiation.

Authors:  J R Trabalka; C P Allen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Disease resistance and enzyme heterozygosity in rainbow trout.

Authors:  M M Ferguson; L R Drahushchak
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Detection of gamma-ray-induced DNA damages in malformed dominant lethal embryos of the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) using AP-PCR fingerprinting.

Authors:  Y Kubota; A Shimada; A Shima
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  DNA oxidative damage and life expectancy in houseflies.

Authors:  S Agarwal; R S Sohal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic diversity at an oncogene locus and in mitochondrial DNA between populations of cancer-prone Atlantic tomcod.

Authors:  I I Wirgin; M D'Amore; C Grunwald; A Goldman; S J Garte
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.890

Review 10.  Population genetic structure and ecotoxicology.

Authors:  S I Guttman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  17 in total

1.  Comparison of two wild rodent species as sentinels of environmental contamination by mine tailings.

Authors:  E Tovar-Sánchez; L T Cervantes; C Martínez; E Rojas; M Valverde; M L Ortiz-Hernández; P Mussali-Galante
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of self-fertilization, environmental stress and exposure to xenobiotics on fitness-related traits of the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis.

Authors:  Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Laurent Lagadic
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Influence of long-term chronic exposure and weather conditions on Scots pine populations.

Authors:  Stanislav Geras'kin; Denis Vasiliyev; Ekaterina Makarenko; Polina Volkova; Alexey Kuzmenkov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Genotoxicity in Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) from a PAH-contaminated Superfund site on the Elizabeth River, Virginia.

Authors:  Dawoon Jung; Cole W Matson; Leonard B Collins; Geoff Laban; Heather M Stapleton; John W Bickham; James A Swenberg; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Genetic diversity and structure of an estuarine fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) indigenous to sites associated with a highly contaminated urban harbor.

Authors:  Amy M McMillan; Mark J Bagley; Suzanne A Jackson; Diane E Nacci
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Effects of radioactive contamination on Scots pines in the remote period after the Chernobyl accident.

Authors:  Stanislav Geras'kin; Alla Oudalova; Nina Dikareva; Sergey Spiridonov; Thomas Hinton; Elena Chernonog; Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Genetic ecotoxicology of asbestos pollution in the house mouse Mus musculus domesticus.

Authors:  Rachel Ben-Shlomo; Uri Shanas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Developmental toxicity and DNA damage from exposure to parking lot runoff retention pond samples in the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).

Authors:  Meryl D Colton; Kevin W H Kwok; Jennifer A Brandon; Isaac H Warren; Ian T Ryde; Ellen M Cooper; David E Hinton; Daniel Rittschof; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.130

9.  The long amplicon quantitative PCR for DNA damage assay as a sensitive method of assessing DNA damage in the environmental model, Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus).

Authors:  Dawoon Jung; Youngeun Cho; Joel N Meyer; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.228

10.  Evidence of population genetic effects in Peromyscus melanophrys chronically exposed to mine tailings in Morelos, Mexico.

Authors:  Patricia Mussali-Galante; Efraín Tovar-Sánchez; Mahara Valverde; Leticia Valencia-Cuevas; E Rojas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.