Literature DB >> 21384142

Genetic ecotoxicology of asbestos pollution in the house mouse Mus musculus domesticus.

Rachel Ben-Shlomo1, Uri Shanas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We tested the genetic diversity in wild mice (Mus musculus domesticus) inhabiting the asbestos-polluted area as a model for the long-term mutagenic effect of asbestos. Hazardous effects of deposited asbestos persist in the environment because of low rate of fiber disintegration. The upper layers of the soil in the vicinity of a former asbestos factory are nearly "saturated" with asbestos fibers and dust. Natural populations of mice dwell in this area and are constantly exposed to asbestos fibers.
METHODS: We measured the microsatellites genetic diversity of wild mice (Mus musculus domesticus) inhabiting the asbestos-polluted area as a model for the long-term mutagenic effect of this environmental toxin.
RESULTS: The six tested microsatellites were highly polymorphic, revealing 111 different alleles for the two sampled populations. Effective number of alleles was slightly higher in the polluted population relative to the control population, while observed heterozygosity was lower. The chromatographic profile of the polluted population exhibited a significantly higher number of bands, probably resulting from somatic mutations, in addition to the ordinary microsatellite band profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure to asbestos fibers significantly elevates the level of somatic mutations. It also leads to a relatively high level of observed homozygosity, a phenomenon that may be associated with loss of heterozygosity. Based on the mice population, our data suggest elevated health risks for humans living in an asbestos-polluted area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384142     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0481-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  32 in total

Review 1.  Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology.

Authors:  J W Bickham; S Sandhu; P D Hebert; L Chikhi; R Athwal
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Multilocus DNA fingerprinting reveals high rate of heritable genetic mutation in herring gulls nesting in an industrialized urban site.

Authors:  C L Yauk; J S Quinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic dissection of anxiety in autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Nakamura; Yan Xiu; Mareki Ohtsuji; Gen Sugita; Masaaki Abe; Naomi Ohtsuji; Yoshitomo Hamano; Yi Jiang; Noriko Takahashi; Toshikazu Shirai; Hiroyuki Nishimura; Sachiko Hirose
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Fitness loss and germline mutations in barn swallows breeding in Chernobyl.

Authors:  H Ellegren; G Lindgren; C R Primmer; A P Møller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A novel single molecule analysis of spontaneous and radiation-induced mutation at a mouse tandem repeat locus.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Yuri E Dubrova; Gemma R Grant; Alec J Jeffreys
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Asbestos and erionite fibres can induce mutations in human lymphocytes that result in loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  K Both; D W Henderson; D R Turner
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Towards construction of a high resolution map of the mouse genome using PCR-analysed microsatellites.

Authors:  J M Love; A M Knight; M A McAleer; J A Todd
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes.

Authors:  Christopher Greenman; Philip Stephens; Raffaella Smith; Gillian L Dalgliesh; Christopher Hunter; Graham Bignell; Helen Davies; Jon Teague; Adam Butler; Claire Stevens; Sarah Edkins; Sarah O'Meara; Imre Vastrik; Esther E Schmidt; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Gurpreet Bhamra; Gemma Buck; Bhudipa Choudhury; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon Forbes; Kris Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones; Andy Menzies; Tatiana Mironenko; Janet Perry; Keiran Raine; Dave Richardson; Rebecca Shepherd; Alexandra Small; Calli Tofts; Jennifer Varian; Tony Webb; Sofie West; Sara Widaa; Andy Yates; Daniel P Cahill; David N Louis; Peter Goldstraw; Andrew G Nicholson; Francis Brasseur; Leendert Looijenga; Barbara L Weber; Yoke-Eng Chiew; Anna DeFazio; Mel F Greaves; Anthony R Green; Peter Campbell; Ewan Birney; Douglas F Easton; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Min-Han Tan; Sok Kean Khoo; Bin Tean Teh; Siu Tsan Yuen; Suet Yi Leung; Richard Wooster; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Population genetic structure and ecotoxicology.

Authors:  S I Guttman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  DNA copy number loss and allelic imbalance at 2p16 in lung cancer associated with asbestos exposure.

Authors:  E Kettunen; M Aavikko; P Nymark; S Ruosaari; H Wikman; E Vanhala; K Salmenkivi; R Pirinen; A Karjalainen; E Kuosma; S Anttila
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.