R Davidson1, M Duerson, R Rathe, R Pauly, R T Watson. 1. Office of Generalist Education, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA. Davidra@medicine.ufla.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare two methods of teaching physical assessment, a traditional faculty-taught course and a course with components taught by specially trained standardized patients (SPs), with respect to students' performances and costs. METHOD: Medical students in their second year and without preliminary course work in physical assessment were taught by faculty-led small groups. Students in their first year were taught by faculty-led lecture-demonstrations and exercises led by physical examination teaching associates (PETAs). Both groups of students were tested with a performance-based examination that involved six identical stations. The costs of both courses were calculated using faculty and SP salaries. RESULTS: There was no difference in students' performances on two of the stations, those involving the eye and abdominal examinations. The class that had been taught by PETAs, however, demonstrated a statistically significant performance advantage on the remaining four stations. The cost saving from using the PETAs was conservatively estimated at $24,155. CONCLUSION: Specially trained SPs can effectively teach the normal physical examination to medical students and are a less expensive alternative to traditional faculty small-group teaching methods.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare two methods of teaching physical assessment, a traditional faculty-taught course and a course with components taught by specially trained standardized patients (SPs), with respect to students' performances and costs. METHOD: Medical students in their second year and without preliminary course work in physical assessment were taught by faculty-led small groups. Students in their first year were taught by faculty-led lecture-demonstrations and exercises led by physical examination teaching associates (PETAs). Both groups of students were tested with a performance-based examination that involved six identical stations. The costs of both courses were calculated using faculty and SP salaries. RESULTS: There was no difference in students' performances on two of the stations, those involving the eye and abdominal examinations. The class that had been taught by PETAs, however, demonstrated a statistically significant performance advantage on the remaining four stations. The cost saving from using the PETAs was conservatively estimated at $24,155. CONCLUSION: Specially trained SPs can effectively teach the normal physical examination to medical students and are a less expensive alternative to traditional faculty small-group teaching methods.
Authors: Ryan T Palmer; Frances E Biagioli; Jasminka Mujcic; Benjamin N Schneider; LeNeva Spires; Lisa G Dodson Journal: Rural Remote Health Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Markus Krautter; Katja Diefenbacher; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Imad Maatouk; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Nadja Koehl-Hackert; Wolfgang Herzog; Christoph Nikendei Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 3.240