Literature DB >> 11500067

Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing.

F Pulvermüller1, M Härle, F Hummel.   

Abstract

Brain activity elicited by visually presented words was investigated using behavioral measures and current source densities calculated from high-resolution EEG recordings. Verbs referring to actions usually performed with different body parts were compared. Behavioral data indicated faster processing of verbs referring to actions performed with the face muscles and articulators (face-related words) compared to verbs referring to movements involving the lower half of the body (leg-related words). Significant topographical differences in brain activity elicited by verb types were found starting approximately 250 ms after word onset. Differences were seen at recording sites located over the motor strip and adjacent frontal cortex. At the vertex, close to the cortical representation of the leg, leg-related verbs (for example, to walk) produced strongest in-going currents, whereas for face-related verbs (for example, to talk) the most in-going activity was seen at more lateral electrodes placed over the left Sylvian fissure, close to the representation of the articulators. Thus, action words caused differential activation along the motor strip, with strongest in-going activity occurring close to the cortical representation of the body parts primarily used for carrying out the actions the verbs refer to. Topographically specific physiological signs of word processing started earlier for face-related words and lasted longer for verbs referring to leg movements. We conclude that verb types can differ in their processing speed and can elicit neurophysiological activity with different cortical topographies. These behavioral and physiological differences can be related to cognitive processes, in particular to lexical semantic access. Our results are consistent with associative theories postulating that words are organized in the brain as distributed cell assemblies whose cortical distributions reflect the words' meanings. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11500067     DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  85 in total

1.  Do I need to have my hands free to understand hand-related language? Investigating the functional relevance of experiential simulations.

Authors:  Jessica Vanessa Strozyk; Carolin Dudschig; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Motor imagery and higher-level cognition: four hurdles before research can sprint forward.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-03-31

3.  Body part representations in verbal semantics.

Authors:  Benjamin Bergen; Ting-Ting Chan Lau; Shweta Narayan; Diana Stojanovic; Kathryn Wheeler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Action word understanding and overt motor behavior.

Authors:  Riccardo Dalla Volta; Claudia Gianelli; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Understanding of action-related and abstract verbs in comparison: a behavioral and TMS study.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Elisa De Stefani; Mariateresa Sestito; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-11

8.  Spatial metaphor processing during temporal sequencing comprehension.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Jin Xue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Jeffrey R Binder; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The Two-Level Theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  David Kemmerer; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.