Literature DB >> 11499881

Detection of marijuana use by oral fluid and urine analysis following single-dose administration of smoked and oral marijuana.

R S Niedbala1, K W Kardos, D F Fritch, S Kardos, T Fries, J Waga, J Robb, E J Cone.   

Abstract

We compared oral fluid testing to urine testing in subjects who were administered single doses of marijuana by smoked and oral routes. Oral fluid specimens were collected with the Intercept DOA Oral Specimen Collection Device, screened for THC with the Cannabinoids Intercept MICRO-PLATE Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) utilizing a 1.0-ng/mL cutoff concentration, and confirmed for THC by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS) with a 0.5-ng/mL cutoff concentration. Urine specimens were screened for 11-nor-carboxy-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) by immunoassay utilizing a 50-ng/mL cutoff concentration and confirmed for THCCOOH by GC-MS with a 15-ng/mL cutoff concentration. Oral fluid specimens tested positive following smoked marijuana (N = 10) consecutively for average periods (+/-SEM; range) of 15 (+/-2; 1-24) and 13 h (+/-3; 1-24) by EIA and GC-MS-MS, respectively. The average THC detection times of the last oral fluid positive specimen following smoked marijuana by EIA and GC-MS-MS were 31 (+/-9; 1-72) and 34 h (+/-11; 1-72), respectively. In comparison to oral fluid, urine specimens generally tested negative for THCCOOH immediately after marijuana use. The average times to detection of the first urine specimen positive for THCCOOH by EIA and GC-MS were 6 (+/-2; 1-16) and 4 h (+/-1; 2-8), respectively. Urine specimens tested positive consecutively for average periods of 26 (+/-9; 2-72) and 33 h (+/-10; 4-72) for EIA and GC-MS, respectively. The average THCCOOH detection times of the last specimen by EIA and GC-MS were 42 (+/-10; 2-72) and 58 h (+/-6; 16-72), respectively. Considering the noninvasive nature of oral fluid collection and improved detection of recent marijuana use compared to urine testing, it was concluded that oral fluid testing for THC offers specific advantages over other means of marijuana testing when used in safety-sensitive testing programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11499881     DOI: 10.1093/jat/25.5.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  38 in total

1.  Cannabinoids and metabolites in expectorated oral fluid after 8 days of controlled around-the-clock oral THC administration.

Authors:  Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; David M Schwope; Eugene W Schwilke; Robert S Goodwin; Deana L Kelly; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Pharmacokinetics of Cannabis Brownies: A Controlled Examination of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Metabolites in Blood and Oral Fluid of Healthy Adult Males and Females.

Authors:  Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; Evan S Herrmann; John M Mitchell; Ronald Flegel; Charles LoDico; George E Bigelow; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Reflection impulsivity in adolescent cannabis users: a comparison with alcohol-using and non-substance-using adolescents.

Authors:  Nadia Solowij; Katy A Jones; Megan E Rozman; Sasha M Davis; Joseph Ciarrochi; Patrick C L Heaven; Nicole Pesa; Dan I Lubman; Murat Yücel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Identification of recent cannabis use: whole-blood and plasma free and glucuronidated cannabinoid pharmacokinetics following controlled smoked cannabis administration.

Authors:  David M Schwope; Erin L Karschner; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled smoked cannabis.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; David M Schwope; Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Cannabinoids and metabolites in expectorated oral fluid following controlled smoked cannabis.

Authors:  Garry Milman; David M Schwope; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 7.  Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Edward J Cone; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Biological markers of drug use in the club setting.

Authors:  Brenda A Miller; Debra Furr-Holden; Mark B Johnson; Harold Holder; Robert Voas; Carolyn Keagy
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled cannabis smoking in frequent and occasional smokers.

Authors:  Matthew N Newmeyer; Nathalie A Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; Damodara R Mendu; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.