BACKGROUND: Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most frequently observed illicit drug in investigations of accidents and driving under the influence of drugs. THC-glucuronide has been suggested as a marker of recent cannabis use, but there are no blood data following controlled THC administration to test this hypothesis. Furthermore, there are no studies directly examining whole-blood cannabinoid pharmacokinetics, although this matrix is often the only available specimen. METHODS: Participants (9 men, 1 woman) resided on a closed research unit and smoked one 6.8% THC cannabis cigarette ad libitum. We quantified THC, 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabinol (CBN), THC-glucuronide and THCCOOH-glucuronide directly in whole blood and plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry within 24 h of collection to obviate stability issues. RESULTS: Median whole blood (plasma) observed maximum concentrations (C(max)) were 50 (76), 6.4 (10), 41 (67), 1.3 (2.0), 2.4 (3.6), 89 (190), and 0.7 (1.4) μg/L 0.25 h after starting smoking for THC, 11-OH- THC, THCCOOH, CBD, CBN, and THCCOOH-glucuronide, respectively, and 0.5 h for THC-glucuronide. At observed C(max), whole-blood (plasma) detection rates were 60% (80%), 80% (90%), and 50% (80%) for CBD, CBN, and THC-glucuronide, respectively. CBD and CBN were not detectable after 1 h in either matrix (LOQ 1.0 μg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Human whole-blood cannabinoid data following cannabis smoking will assist whole blood and plasma cannabinoid interpretation, while furthering identification of recent cannabis intake.
BACKGROUND: Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most frequently observed illicit drug in investigations of accidents and driving under the influence of drugs. THC-glucuronide has been suggested as a marker of recent cannabis use, but there are no blood data following controlled THC administration to test this hypothesis. Furthermore, there are no studies directly examining whole-blood cannabinoid pharmacokinetics, although this matrix is often the only available specimen. METHODS:Participants (9 men, 1 woman) resided on a closed research unit and smoked one 6.8% THCcannabis cigarette ad libitum. We quantified THC, 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabinol (CBN), THC-glucuronide and THCCOOH-glucuronide directly in whole blood and plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry within 24 h of collection to obviate stability issues. RESULTS: Median whole blood (plasma) observed maximum concentrations (C(max)) were 50 (76), 6.4 (10), 41 (67), 1.3 (2.0), 2.4 (3.6), 89 (190), and 0.7 (1.4) μg/L 0.25 h after starting smoking for THC, 11-OH- THC, THCCOOH, CBD, CBN, and THCCOOH-glucuronide, respectively, and 0.5 h for THC-glucuronide. At observed C(max), whole-blood (plasma) detection rates were 60% (80%), 80% (90%), and 50% (80%) for CBD, CBN, and THC-glucuronide, respectively. CBD and CBN were not detectable after 1 h in either matrix (LOQ 1.0 μg/L). CONCLUSIONS:Human whole-blood cannabinoid data following cannabis smoking will assist whole blood and plasma cannabinoid interpretation, while furthering identification of recent cannabis intake.
Authors: J E Manno; B R Manno; P M Kemp; D D Alford; I K Abukhalaf; M E McWilliams; F N Hagaman; M J Fitzgerald Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Dayong Lee; David M Schwope; Garry Milman; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Randi Melissa Schuster; Kevin Potter; Ryan Vandrey; Maya Hareli; Jodi Gilman; David Schoenfeld; A Eden Evins Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Cristina Sempio; Marilyn A Huestis; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Jost Klawitter; Uwe Christians; Thomas K Henthorn Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Nathalie A Desrosiers; Johannes G Ramaekers; Emeline Chauchard; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Chao Liu; Sayed H Sadat; Koji Ebisumoto; Akihiro Sakai; Bharat A Panuganti; Shuling Ren; Yusuke Goto; Sunny Haft; Takahito Fukusumi; Mizuo Ando; Yuki Saito; Theresa Guo; Pablo Tamayo; Huwate Yeerna; William Kim; Jacqueline Hubbard; Andrew B Sharabi; J Silvio Gutkind; Joseph A Califano Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sarah K Himes; Karl B Scheidweiler; Olof Beck; David A Gorelick; Nathalie A Desrosiers; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Mateus M Bergamaschi; Erin L Karschner; Robert S Goodwin; Karl B Scheidweiler; Jussi Hirvonen; Regina H C Queiroz; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Isabelle Boileau; Esmaeil Mansouri; Belinda Williams; Bernard Le Foll; Pablo Rusjan; Romina Mizrahi; Rachel F Tyndale; Marilyn A Huestis; Doris E Payer; Alan A Wilson; Sylvain Houle; Stephen J Kish; Junchao Tong Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 13.382