Literature DB >> 11498065

Excess mortality in women with hospital-acquired bloodstream infection.

L Leibovici1, M Paul, M Weinberger, H Koenigsberger, M Drucker, Z Samra, J Yahav, S D Pitlik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the outcomes of bloodstream infection in men and in women and whether any sex-related differences were explained by underlying disorders, severity of disease, or clinical management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using a prospectively collected database, we compared in-hospital mortality in men and women. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to test whether sex-related differences could be due to potential confounders.
RESULTS: Of 4250 patients with bloodstream infections, 1750 (41%) had hospital-acquired infections. The overall case fatality was 31% (625 of 2032) in women and 29% (631 of 2218, P = 0.1) in men. However, 43% (325/758) of the women with hospital-acquired infections died, compared with 33% (327/992) of the men (P = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, female sex was associated with greater mortality in patients with hospital-acquired infections (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 2.6). The excess mortality in women was mainly seen in patients with major underlying disorders (fatality rate of 45% [234 of 525] in women vs. 32% in men [234 of 743, P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in women with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections is substantially greater than in men. The excess mortality was concentrated in women with severe underlying disorders, suggesting that sepsis might have accentuated differences in the outcome of underlying disorders in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11498065     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00771-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of patient characteristics, clinical management, infectious specialist consultation, and outcome in men and women with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a propensity-score adjusted retrospective study.

Authors:  E Forsblom; A Kakriainen; E Ruotsalainen; A Järvinen
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Gender differences in mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Authors:  Anthony P Pietropaoli; Laurent G Glance; David Oakes; Susan G Fisher
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2010-10

3.  [Severe bacterial infection: increased mortality in elderly women with low body weight taking drugs prolonging the QTc interval].

Authors:  S Suefke; H Djonlagić; T Kibbel
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  Systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: does female sex really protect?

Authors:  M C Seghaye; M Qing; G von Bernuth
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores differ between genders in a sepsis cohort: cause or effect?

Authors:  Sofie Jacobson; Eva Liedgren; Göran Johansson; Martin Ferm; Ola Winsö
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.384

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.