Literature DB >> 11497421

Characterization of the rod photoresponse isolated from the dark-adapted primate ERG.

J A Jamison1, R A Bush, B Lei, P A Sieving.   

Abstract

The a-wave of the human dark-adapted ERG is thought to derive from activity of rod photoreceptors. However, other sources within the retina could potentially perturb this simple equation. We investigated the extent to which the short-latency dark-adapted rod a-wave of the primate ERG is dominated by the rod photoresponse and the applicability of the phototransduction model to fit the rod a-wave. Dark-adapted Ganzfeld ERGs were elicited over a 5-log-unit intensity range using short bright xenon flashes, and the light-adapted cone responses were subtracted to isolate the rod ERG a-wave. Intravitreal 4-phosphono-butyric acid (APB) and cis-2,3-piperidine-dicarboxylic acid (PDA) were applied to isolate the photoreceptor response. The Hood and Birch version of the phototransduction model, Rmax[1 - e(-I x S x (t-t(eff)))2], was fitted to the a-wave data while allowing Rmax and S to vary. Three principle observations were made: (1) At flash intensities > or =0.77 log sc-td-s the leading edge of the normalized rod ERG a-wave tracks the isolated photoreceptor response across the first 20 ms or up to the point of b-wave intrusion. The rod ERG a-wave was essentially identical to the isolated receptor response for all intensities that produce peak responses within 14 ms after the flash. (2) The best fit of sensitivity (S) was not affected by APB and/or PDA, suggesting that the inner retina contributes very little to the dark-adapted a-wave. (3) APB always reduced the maximum dark-adapted a-wave amplitude (by 15-30%), and PDA always increased it (by 7-15%). Using the phototransduction model, both events can be interpreted as a scaling of the photoreceptor dark current. This suggests that activity of postreceptor cells somehow influences the rod dark current, possibly by feedback through horizontal cells (although currently not demonstrated for the rod system), or by altering the ionic concentrations near the photoreceptors, or by neuromodulator effects mediated by dopamine or melatonin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497421     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523801183112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of conventional ERG parameters and high-intensity A-wave analysis in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Alexandra Serrato; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Contribution of cone photoreceptors and post-receptoral mechanisms to the human photopic electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; C P Allen; P J Mason; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Electrophysiological studies in newly onset type 2 diabetes without visible vascular retinopathy.

Authors:  M Tyrberg; U Lindblad; A Melander; M Lövestam-Adrian; V Ponjavic; S Andréasson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Modelling the initial phase of the human rod photoreceptor response to the onset of steady illumination.

Authors:  Omar A R Mahroo; Vin Shen Ban; Benjamin M Bussmann; Hannah C Copley; Christopher J Hammond; Trevor D Lamb
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Temperature effects on low-light vision in juvenile rockfish (genus Sebastes) and consequences for habitat utilization.

Authors:  C R L Reilly; S H Thompson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The cone electroretinogram in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne B Fulton; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Intracellular delivery of proteins into mouse Müller glia cells in vitro and in vivo using Pep-1 transfection reagent.

Authors:  Minhua H Wang; Laura J Frishman; Deborah C Otteson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Photoreceptor and postreceptor responses in congenital stationary night blindness.

Authors:  Aparna Raghuram; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Contribution of retinal ganglion cells to the mouse electroretinogram.

Authors:  Benjamin J Smith; Xu Wang; Balwantray C Chauhan; Patrice D Côté; François Tremblay
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Reprogramming amacrine and photoreceptor progenitors into retinal ganglion cells by replacing Neurod1 with Atoh7.

Authors:  Chai-An Mao; Jang-Hyeon Cho; Jing Wang; Zhiguang Gao; Ping Pan; Wen-Wei Tsai; Laura J Frishman; William H Klein
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.