Literature DB >> 11495829

Development of multiple movement representations with practice: specificity versus flexibility.

M C Soucy1, L Proteau.   

Abstract

The question addressed in the present experiment was whether an individual who practices a task under different conditions of afferent information develops different movement representations, each of which is based on the most accurate source of afferent information for movement control. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 23) performed a manual aiming movement in a target-only condition for 520 trials before performing in a normal vision condition for an equivalent amount of practice. Control groups performed all practice trials in either a normal vision or a target-only condition. The results revealed that the movement representation developed in the initial (target-only) practice phase remained accessible for movement planning and control. The results of Experiment 2 indicated, however, that participants did not maintain such a representation when their initial practice in the target-only condition was reduced (40 or 160 trials) before they had extensive practice in normal vision. Those results indicate that extensive practice in a target-only and then in a normal vision condition enables an individual to plan and control his or her movement on the basis of the most efficient source of available afferent information. Because visual afferent information provides optimal information for ensuring movement accuracy, however, if initial practice in the target-only condition is only modest or moderate it is likely that that information source will progressively dominate all other sources of afferent information for movement planning and control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495829     DOI: 10.1080/00222890109601910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  4 in total

1.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task.

Authors:  Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The specificity of practice hypothesis in goal-directed movements: visual dominance or proprioception neglect?

Authors:  Lucette Toussaint; Aurore Meugnot; Arnaud Badets; David Chesnet; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-12

3.  Suboptimal online control of aiming movements in virtual contexts.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.