Literature DB >> 11495005

Prognostic relevance of intracytoplasmic cytokeratin pattern, hormone expression profile, and cell proliferation in pituitary adenomas of akromegalic patients.

P R Mazal1, T Czech, R Sedivy, M Aichholzer, J Wanschitz, N Klupp, H Budka.   

Abstract

Seventy-six pituitary adenomas of akromegalic patients were investigated to find out the prognostic relevance of the intracytoplasmic distribution of cytokeratins (CK), immunohistochemically defined hormone production profile, proliferative activity and clinical presentation. CK distribution, growth fraction (MIB1 index) and hormone production profile were analyzed by means of immunohistochemistry. Apoptotic activity was investigated by the TUNEL method. Two different CK distribution patterns were seen: a dot-like pattern in 29 cases (type 1 adenomas), and a perinuclear fibrillary pattern in 47 cases (type 2 adenomas). Type 2 adenomas showed more prominent coexpression of prolactin (p < 0.0001), luteotrophic hormone (p < 0.002), follicle-stimulating hormone (p < 0.005), thyroid-stimulating hormone (p < 0.0001), and alpha-subunit (p < 0.005), as compared to type 1 adenomas. The mean MIB1 index was significantly higher in type 1 vs. type 2 tumors (4.23%, range: 1.93% - 9.83% vs. 2.07%, range: 0.67% - 4.87%, p < 0.0001). Apoptotic activity was too low in both examined groups to be used for balancing of tumor cell turnover. Clinical analysis of patients with type 1 adenomas revealed female predominance, younger age, larger tumor size, and more frequently aggressive growth with higher incidence of suprasellar extension (p < 0.0001) and cavernous sinus infiltration (p < 0.0001), as well as larger proportions of re-operations and incomplete resections (34.5% vs. 8.51%). Additionally, the interval until re-operation was shorter in type 1 adenomas (mean: 16 months, range: 9 - 21 months vs. mean: 57 months, range: 18- 158 months). We conclude that classification of adenomas of akromegalic patients based on intracytoplasmic CK distribution, combined with examination of proliferative activity, and immunohistochemically defined hormone production profile, provides important prognostic information for the management of akromegalic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropathol        ISSN: 0722-5091            Impact factor:   1.368


  20 in total

Review 1.  Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Authors:  E Fernandez-Rodriguez; F F Casanueva; I Bernabeu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Predictors of surgical outcome and early criteria of remission in acromegaly.

Authors:  Ximene Antunes; Nina Ventura; Gustavo Bittencourt Camilo; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Andre Guasti; Paulo José M Pereira; Aline Helen Silva Camacho; Leila Chimelli; Paulo Niemeyer; Mônica R Gadelha; Leandro Kasuki
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Growth hormone tumor histological subtypes predict response to surgical and medical therapy.

Authors:  Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Nichole E Carlson; Manuel T Borges; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Kevin O Lillehei; Janice M Kerr; Margaret E Wierman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Clinical implications of growth hormone-secreting tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Shibana Shafi; Janice M Kerr; Tzu L Phang; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Margaret E Wierman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Management of aggressive growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Daniel A Donoho; Namrata Bose; Gabriel Zada; John D Carmichael
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological comparison of sparsely and densely granulated somatotroph adenomas: a single center experience from a cohort of 131 patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Amy A Swanson; Dana Erickson; Diane Mary Donegan; Sarah M Jenkins; Jamie J Van Gompel; John L D Atkinson; Bradley J Erickson; Caterina Giannini
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Differential somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 1-5 expression and downstream effectors in histologic subtypes of growth hormone pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Mei Xu; Taylor S Mills; Elizabeth E Smith; Lori J Silveira; Kevin O Lillehei; Janice M Kerr; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Margaret E Wierman
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 8.  Clinical Impact of the Current WHO Classification of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  W Saeger; J Honegger; M Theodoropoulou; U J Knappe; C Schöfl; S Petersenn; R Buslei
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Expression of adhesion molecules and cytokeratin 20 in merkel cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yasushi Tanaka; Toshiaki Sano; Zhi Rong Qian; Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.943

10.  Clinicopathological features of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: difference among various types defined by cytokeratin distribution pattern including a transitional form.

Authors:  Abdulkader Obari; Toshiaki Sano; Kenichi Ohyama; Eiji Kudo; Zhi Rong Qian; Akiko Yoneda; Nasim Rayhan; Muhammad Mustafizur Rahman; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.943

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.