Literature DB >> 11494292

First trimester screening for Down syndrome and assisted reproduction: no basis for concern.

K R Wøjdemann1, S O Larsen, A Shalmi, K Sundberg, M Christiansen, A Tabor.   

Abstract

In pregnancies obtained after assisted reproduction the false-positive rate of second trimester Down syndrome (DS) screening is increased by 1.5-3-fold. This may cause an increase in the number of amniocenteses and the fetal loss rate. The present study for the first time examined whether assisted reproductive technologies affect the results of first trimester screening. The markers PAPP-A, free beta-hCG and the nuchal translucency (NT) thickness were examined at 12-14 weeks' gestation. Screening markers in 47 in vitro fertilisation (IVF), 63 ovulation induction (OI) and 3026 spontaneously conceived singleton pregnancies were compared. The MoM (multiples of the median) value in the IVF pregnancies was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.85-1.22) for PAPP-A, 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95-1.37) for beta-hCG and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.89-1.05) for NT; the MoM value in the OI pregnancies was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-1.05) for PAPP-A, 1.08 (95% CI: 0.93-1.25) for beta-hCG and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.95-1.11) for NT. The first trimester marker values in assisted reproductive pregnancies and spontaneously conceived pregnancies were not significantly different. Estimated false-positive rates for a risk cut-off of 1:400 varied from 4.7% in IVF pregnancies to 5.1% in OI pregnancies. Therefore the false-positive rate in Down syndrome screening should be independent of the method of conception. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11494292     DOI: 10.1002/pd.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  7 in total

1.  Low first-trimester PAPP-A in IVF (fresh and frozen-thawed) pregnancies, likely due to a biological cause.

Authors:  Lauren P Hunt; A M McInerney-Leo; S Sinnott; B Sutton; R Cincotta; G Duncombe; J Chua; M Peterson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  First-trimester screening for Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies achieved by intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsuan Lai; Su-Chee Chen; Ming-Song Tsai; Fa-Kung Lee; Chi-Feng Wei
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 4.  First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 5.  Second trimester serum tests for Down's Syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Jonathan J Deeks; Boliang Guo; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 6.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 7.  Urine tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Boliang Guo; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mary Pennant; Susanna Wisniewski; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.