Literature DB >> 11490234

Interval after prostate specific antigen testing and subsequent risk of incurable prostate cancer.

S L Yao1, G Lu-Yao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies of the potential effect of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening on a less than yearly basis have been limited to computer simulations using relatively small sample sets. Primary clinical data on this relationship have not been generally available. We examined the relationship of less frequent testing and the risk of nonlocalized incurable cancer. The effect of testing frequency on the risk of prostate biopsy in men ultimately diagnosed with cancer was also assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a population based sample of 36,422 men 65 years old or older residing in 9 geographic areas with newly diagnosed prostate cancer during 1989 to 1993. The primary end point was the risk of nonlocalized cancer, as determined by logistic regression. Patient age, geographic region, year of diagnosis and race were included as covariates.
RESULTS: In men who would be diagnosed with prostate cancer the risk of nonlocalized cancer did not differ in those tested 2 or 3 years compared with the risk in those tested 1 year before diagnosis (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.20 and 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.41, respectively). However, the risk of prostate biopsy in these men was directly related to the number of PSA tests performed (test for trend p = 0.0061).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who choose to undergo PSA testing may be tested on a biennial instead of annual basis without an increased risks of nonlocalized cancer. Decreasing the frequency of PSA testing may lead to fewer prostate biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11490234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Racial differences in PSA screening interval and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Daniel L Howard; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Sara E Wobker; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Trends in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in the elderly.

Authors:  Kathleen Lang; Craig C Earle; Talia Foster; Deirdre Dixon; Renilt Van Gool; Joseph Menzin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.

Authors:  Nathaniel Oswald; Tengda Lin; Benjamin Haaland; Michael Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kathleen A Cooney; William Lowrance; Heidi A Hanson; Brock O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Differentiation of cancer cell type and phenotype using quantum dot-gold nanoparticle sensor arrays.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Yi-Cheun Yeh; Subinoy Rana; Ying Jiang; Lin Guo; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Benny Holmström; Mattias Johansson; Anders Bergh; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Göran Hallmans; Pär Stattin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-24

7.  Decision fatigue in low-value prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Trevor C Hunt; Jacob P Ambrose; Benjamin Haaland; Kensaku Kawamoto; Christopher B Dechet; William T Lowrance; Heidi A Hanson; Brock B O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.860

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.