Literature DB >> 11487297

Effect of position on the posteroanterior stiffness of the lumbar spine.

S. J. Edmondston1, G. T. Allison, C. D. Gregg, S. M. Purden, G. R. Svansson, A. E. Watson.   

Abstract

SUMMARY. Physiotherapists commonly use motion testing techniques in the assessment of patients with spinal disorders. One of the techniques considered important in the assessment of low back pain is the application of posteroanterior (PA) forces to the lumbar spinous processes to evaluate spinal stiffness and symptom response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of spinal position on the measured lumbar PA stiffness. The PA stiffness at the L3 and L5 vertebral levels was assessed in 12 painfree subjects in three prone lying positions (flexion, neutral and extension). PA forces were applied to the spinous processes, under quasi-static loading conditions, using a specifically built apparatus. The stiffness coefficient was calculated from the slope of the regression line fitted to the truncated (35N-80N) force-displacement curves. At both vertebral levels, the PA stiffness was position dependent, with the lowest values obtained in the neutral position. The mean stiffness increased by 12.4% in extension and 31.9% in flexion. In all positions PA stiffness was significantly greater at L5 than at L3. These results suggest that clinical assessments of lumbar PA stiffness may be influenced by the patient position in which the test is performed. Comparative assessments of PA stiffness over time should be performed with the spine supported in the same position. Copyright 1998 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 11487297     DOI: 10.1054/math.1998.0312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  8 in total

1.  Performance and reliability of a variable rate, force/displacement application system.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Tiffany Edgecombe; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-17

3.  A clinical perspective on a pain neuroscience education approach to manual therapy.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Jo Nijs; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  Comparison of posteroanterior spinal stiffness measures to clinical and demographic findings at baseline in patients enrolled in a clinical study of spinal manipulation for low back pain.

Authors:  Edward F Owens; James W DeVocht; M Ram Gudavalli; David G Wilder; William C Meeker
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  The effect of application site of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Tiffany L Edgecombe; Greg N Kawchuk; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  The comfort and safety of a novel rolling mechanical indentation device for the measurement of lumbar trunk stiffness in young adults.

Authors:  Benjamin T Brown; Alexandra Blacke; Vanessa Carroll; Petra L Graham; Greg Kawchuk; Aron Downie; Michael Swain
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2017-08-03

7.  Development of an Objective Portable Measurement Device for Spinal Joint Accessory Motion Testing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Kuan Wu; Hung-Jen Lai; Ting Teng; Chung-Huang Yu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  The effect of manual therapy and neuroplasticity education on chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Kevin Farrell; Merrill Landers; Martin Barclay; Elise Goodman; Jordan Gillund; Sara McCaffrey; Laura Timmerman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.