PURPOSE: To compare circadian changes of systemic circulation in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and normal subjects. METHODS: Forty-three patients with NTG and 226 normal subjects were enrolled in this study. Circulatory parameters, including blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR), were measured in all subjects for 49 hours using an ambulatory monitoring system. In addition to a comparison between NTG patients and normal controls, the same parameters were compared between NTG patients who had progressive field defects and NTG patients who had stable field defects. RESULTS: The BP in NTG patients was significantly higher than in normal subjects. The nocturnal dip of BP in NTG patients was similar to the dip in normal subjects. However, the BP dip in NTG patients showing progressive visual field defects was significantly smaller than in patients with NTG showing stable visual field defects. Blood pressure fluctuation in sleep in the "progressive" patients was significantly greater than in the "stable" patients. Patients with NTG whose random BP was in a normal range showed a higher BP than normal subjects. The dip in PR in NTG patients was significantly lower than in normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: An insufficient physiological nocturnal BP dip or a greater nocturnal fluctuation in BP may disturb the microcirculation of, and/or may directly damage, the optic nerve, resulting in increasing field loss in NTG.
PURPOSE: To compare circadian changes of systemic circulation in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and normal subjects. METHODS: Forty-three patients with NTG and 226 normal subjects were enrolled in this study. Circulatory parameters, including blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR), were measured in all subjects for 49 hours using an ambulatory monitoring system. In addition to a comparison between NTG patients and normal controls, the same parameters were compared between NTG patients who had progressive field defects and NTG patients who had stable field defects. RESULTS: The BP in NTG patients was significantly higher than in normal subjects. The nocturnal dip of BP in NTG patients was similar to the dip in normal subjects. However, the BP dip in NTG patients showing progressive visual field defects was significantly smaller than in patients with NTG showing stable visual field defects. Blood pressure fluctuation in sleep in the "progressive" patients was significantly greater than in the "stable" patients. Patients with NTG whose random BP was in a normal range showed a higher BP than normal subjects. The dip in PR in NTG patients was significantly lower than in normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: An insufficient physiological nocturnal BP dip or a greater nocturnal fluctuation in BP may disturb the microcirculation of, and/or may directly damage, the optic nerve, resulting in increasing field loss in NTG.
Authors: Asan Kochkorov; Konstantin Gugleta; Robert Katamay; Josef Flammer; Selim Orgul Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jesus D Melgarejo; Jan V Eijgen; Gladys E Maestre; Lama A Al-Aswad; Lutgarde Thijs; Luis J Mena; Joseph H Lee; Joseph D Terwilliger; Michele Petitto; Carlos A Chávez; Miguel Brito; Gustavo Calmon; Egle Silva; Dong-Mei Wei; Ella Cutsforth; Karel V Keer; C Gustavo De Moraes; Thomas Vanassche; Stefan Janssens; Ingeborg Stalmans; Peter Verhamme; Jan A Staessen; Zhen-Yu Zhang Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 3.080
Authors: Jelle Bossuyt; Gwendolijn Vandekerckhove; Tine L M De Backer; Sandrien Van de Velde; Majda Azermai; Anna-Maria Stevens; Philippe Kestelyn; Tia Raemdonck; Patrick Segers; Floris Vanmolkot; Luc M Van Bortel Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Sabrina Reinehr; Sara C Gomes; Caroline J Gassel; M Ali Asaad; Gesa Stute; Marc Schargus; H Burkhard Dick; Stephanie C Joachim Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Seong Hee Shim; Chan Yun Kim; Joon Mo Kim; Da Yeong Kim; Yang Jae Kim; Jeong Hun Bae; Ki Chul Sung Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Seung Uk Lee; Han Su Park; Bong Joon Kim; Hyun Su Kim; Jung Ho Heo; Sung Il Im Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 1.817