Literature DB >> 11485272

Radiographic measurement of residual root thickness in premolars with post preparation.

G Raiden1, S Koss, L Costa, J L Hernández.   

Abstract

A minimum thickness of 1 mm has been suggested for the residual root wall in post preparation. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the reliability of radiography when used to measure root thickness. In 106 upper first premolars with one and two root canals, post preparations were made with Peeso reamers to a depth in the root equal to the crown length. Bucco-palatal radiographs were taken of each tooth. The films were processed and projected with a magnification of x20. The smallest thickness of the mesial and distal walls of each root at the apical end of the preparation was measured and recorded. The teeth were then cut at the level of the measurement, and the smallest thickness of the proximal walls was measured using a microscope with a micrometric eyepiece. Fourteen percent of the teeth with one root canal and 27% of the teeth with two root canals could not be measured due to blurred radiographic contours. Variance analysis showed a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) when radiographic and anatomical measurements were compared. The radiograph showed greater thicknesses than were actually present and should not therefore be considered to be a reliable method for measuring residual thickness of tooth walls after post preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11485272     DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200104000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  9 in total

1.  Computed tomography evaluation of residual root thickness after pre-flaring using gates Glidden drills: The sequence effect.

Authors:  Nahid M Akhlaghi; Amirali Naghdi; Laleh Mohammadian Bajgiran; Elahe Behrooz
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-03

2.  In vitro evaluation of the post-space depth reading with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to a traditional silicon impression.

Authors:  A Pinto; L Arcuri; P Carosi; R Nardi; A Libonati; L Ottria; V Campanella
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  Evaluation of radicular dentin thickness of danger zone in mandibular first molars.

Authors:  M Tabrizizadeh; J Reuben; M Khalesi; M Mousavinasab; Mk Ghane Ezabadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-09-30

4.  The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study.

Authors:  Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Laleh Mohammadian Bajgiran; Amirali Naghdi; Elaheh Behrooz; Zohreh Khalilak
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Direct Linear Measurement of Root Dentin Thickness and Dentin Volume Changes with Post Space Preparation: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Shoeb Yakub Shaikh; Safia Shoeb Shaikh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

6.  Root Dentine Thickness and Concavity Depth in Mandibular Molars: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Population Study.

Authors:  Juan Gonzalo Olivieri; Fernando Duran-Sindreu
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2018-11-21

7.  Root dentine thickness of danger zone in mesial roots of mandibular first molars.

Authors:  Guangchao Zhou; Diya Leng; Mingming Li; Yang Zhou; Cuifeng Zhang; Chao Sun; Daming Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  An in vitro study of mesiobuccal root thickness of maxillary first molars.

Authors:  Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Yasaman Ravandoust; Mohammad Najafi; Bahareh Dadresanfar
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  The remaining dentin thickness investigation of the attempt to remove broken instrument from mesiobuccal canals of maxillary first molars with virtual simulation technique.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Gary Shun-Pan Cheung; Ya Shen; Dingming Huang; Xuedong Zhou; Yuan Gao
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.757

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.