Literature DB >> 11482623

Surface anatomy of the face in Down's syndrome: linear and angular measurements in the craniofacial regions.

L G Farkas1, M J Katic, C R Forrest, L Litsas.   

Abstract

Measurements (23 projective linear, 2 angular) taken in the 6 craniofacial regions of 127 patients with Down's syndrome showed that 63.1% (1,836 of 2,908) were within normal limits and 36.9% (1,072) were outside them. Abnormal measurements were subnormal in 90.8% (973) and supernormal in 9.2% (99). All statistical summaries were based on z scores (adjusting for age and sex differences) classified into a small number of ranges to yield a simplified frequency distribution for each measurement. The purpose of the study was to identify the measurements closest to normal and those indicating the most severe degrees of sub- or supernormality. Approximately a quarter of normal measurements were classified as optimal, and half the subnormal or supernormal measurements were classified as severe. Intercanthal width had the highest frequency of optimal measurements (93.7%, 119 of 127), head circumference the smallest (28.6%, 36 of 126). Knowledge of the frequency of extreme abnormalities in the craniofacial regions will help during visual examination of patients with Down's syndrome. This study found the highest percentage of severely subnormal measurements in the orbital region (57.8%, 74 of 128) and the smallest in the labio-oral region (32.7%, 16 of 49). The measurement with the highest proportion of severely subnormal to all subnormal values was the palpebral fissure length (68%, 51 of 75), and the nose width had the smallest proportion (14.3%, 1 of 7).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11482623     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200107000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Craniofacial Characteristics of Thalassemia Major Patients.

Authors:  Sacide Karakas; Ayfer Metin Tellioglu; Mehmet Bilgin; Imran Kurt Omurlu; Sercin Caliskan; Salih Coskun
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  The Influence of trisomy 21 on facial form and variability.

Authors:  John M Starbuck; Theodore M Cole; Roger H Reeves; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Morphological integration of soft-tissue facial morphology in Down Syndrome and siblings.

Authors:  John Starbuck; Roger H Reeves; Joan Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 4.  Revisiting Down syndrome from the ENT perspective: review of literature and recommendations.

Authors:  Maria Ramia; Umayya Musharrafieh; Wajdi Khaddage; Alain Sabri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Assessment of Midfacial Hypoplasia in Down Syndrome Fetuses - Validity of a Two-Line Approach and Introduction of a Novel Angle (Maxilla-Mandible-Nasion Angle).

Authors:  J Weichert; M Gembicki; J Ribbat-Idel; D R Hartge
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-05

6.  Three-dimensional assessment of nose and lip morphology in North Sudanese subjects with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Chiarella Sforza; Fadil Elamin; Riccardo Rosati; Marco Alberto Lucchini; Davide G Tommasi; Virgilio F Ferrario
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.